DEATH PENALTY IN INDONESIA: WHAT AND WHY? IS IT NOT AGAINST UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHT PRINCIPLE?

Abstract

Even though Indonesia has ratified International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) in 2005 which directly recognizes the right to life, at the same time Indonesia has committed to apply the death penalty in its law system. Strengthened by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia through its verdict, the legality of the death penalty implementation in Indonesia cannot be void, considering the natures of the Court verdict which are final and binding. However, the issue of the death penalty is debatable among society because it is clear that under article 28I paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution to protect its people right to life. Besides, the ineffectiveness justice system in Indonesia also become one of the main grounds for cons groups to propose to the government for abolishing the death penalty as a form of punishment in the Indonesian law system. Aiming to comprehend this issue reasonably, this paper is not only going to explore the grounds of the government of the Republic of Indonesia for promoting and supporting the death penalty as one of real punishment in Indonesia but also explain the details of types crimes in which can be sentenced a death. Under article 6 paragraph (2) of ICCPR, there is a room for a country which has not to abolish the death penalty to sentence a death but only for only the most serious crimes. Thus, Do the type of crimes which can be convicted a death in Indonesia meet the definition of the most serious crimes agreed by international law and the national security interest? If so, Is this policy against the human right to life? This article will expose some scholars’ arguments, cases, jurisprudence, and verdicts to show the standing of the author in this issue.

Authors and Affiliations

Rima Yuwana YUSTIKANINGRUM

Keywords

Related Articles

AN OVERVIEW ON THE TRANSLATIVE VERSUS THE CONSTITUTIVE EFFECT OF THE INHERITANCE PARTITION IN ROMANIA

Nowadays, the article 995 of the Romanian Code of Civil Procedure regulates the so-called constitutive effect of the partition decision. Although the 2004 draft of the new Civil code stipulated a retroactive (declarative...

ACTUAL ISSUES REGARDING THE ENFORCEMENT OF LEGAL STANDARDS OF THE DEED OF INTIMATION LODGED WITH THE COURT OF LAW IN THE ROMANIAN COURT PROCEEDINGS

The dynamic evolution of the new fundamental law in criminal matters triggered serious challenges in the adaptation process to the new legal realities of the Romanian legal system, as a whole. Within the seeming conclus...

ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE AND LEARNING FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF AN OPEN SYSTEM

A learning organization must be constituted in a dynamic environment of constant changes, prepared to engage and interact in systemic and systematic way with the context in which it operates. The present work intends to...

TEN YEARS AFTER THE GLOBAL CRISES - EXPORTS RECOVERY AT REGIONAL LEVEL IN ROMANIA

After ten years of the global financial crises, which peak in Romania was 2009, the negative impact on exports and imports of Romania are still in place for some Romanian counties. The scale of the impact highlights the...

LEGISLATIVE MEASURES ON THE ISSUE OF PRISON OVERCROWDING AND IMPROPER MATERIAL CONDITIONS OF DETENTION, FOLLOWING THE ECtHR PILOT-JUDGMENT REZMIVEȘ AND OTHERS AGAINST ROMANIA

This paper deals with the issue of prison overcrowding and improper material conditions of detention. The first part of the study is developed based on the national standards, followed by a presentation of the internatio...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP590933
  • DOI -
  • Views 134
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Rima Yuwana YUSTIKANINGRUM (2019). DEATH PENALTY IN INDONESIA: WHAT AND WHY? IS IT NOT AGAINST UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHT PRINCIPLE?. Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ), 11(13), 825-830. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-590933