Debata Fish – Dworkin jako przykład sporu o praktykę interpretacji prawa

Journal Title: Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej - Year 2015, Vol 11, Issue 2

Abstract

The aim of the article is to critically asses the theories of interpretation developed by two prominent philosophers, namely Stanley Fish and Ronald Dworkin. After first describing and reconstructing their ideas the paper then identifies problems concerning the stance according to which everything in applying law depends on interpretation. The critic is based on the Ludwig’s Wittgenstein remark that there must be grasping the rule (or more broadly a meaning of any word) which is not interpretation, otherwise we end up in regressus ad infinitum fallacy. Paper’s main claim is that although the theory of R. Dworkin is not fully free from defects it has nevertheless more explanation power than the opponent’s propositions.

Authors and Affiliations

Michał Pełka

Keywords

Related Articles

Prawo jako przedmiot kulturowy w filozofii prawa Carlosa Cossio

The main purpose of this article is to present the view of an Argentinian legal philosopher Carlos Cossio on the issue of law. He called his philosophy “egology”. The originality of Cossio’s works is expressed by a stron...

The Revolutionary Political Philosophy of Ayn Rand

Ayn Rand is generally considered a libertarian, although she never claimed to belong to this movement. Undoubtedly, she was best known for promoting liberal and capitalist ideas. The author of this paper argues that Rand...

Reflexivity and the Codification of Legal Ethics. Remarks on the Basis of Paul Ricoeur’s “Little Ethics” Theory

Codes of legal ethics encounter constant waves of criticism. It is pointed out that their disadvantage is, on the one hand, the excessive casuistry, limiting the possibility of taking independent decisions in cases of et...

Krytyczna analiza dyskursu sądowego dotyczącego prawnej sytuacji osób homoseksualnych w świetle art. 18 Konstytucji RP

W niniejszym artykule dokonuję próby analizy dyskursu sądowego poświęconego osobom homoseksualnym w świetle dyspozycji art. 18 Konstytucji. Celem pokazania tego jak w dyskursie sądowym dochodzi do reprodukcji nierównego...

On Social Rights from an Analytical and Philosophical Perspective

The paper examines the concept of social rights from both the analytical and philosophical perspective. In the first part of the paper a distinction is made between social rights in the strict sense (called in the paper...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP178837
  • DOI -
  • Views 211
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Michał Pełka (2015). Debata Fish – Dworkin jako przykład sporu o praktykę interpretacji prawa. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, 11(2), 86-105. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-178837