Decisional conflict in patients scheduled for insertion of a Central Venous Catheter to receive chemotherapy: protocol for a cross-sectional study

Journal Title: Biomedicine & Prevention - Year 2018, Vol 2018, Issue 1

Abstract

Introduction Decisional conflict is defined as "the subjective uncertainty about the best choice to make when the options are competing with each other and involve risk, loss, regret or challenge to personal values". Although uncertainty is an intrinsic characteristic of the choice of the patient between several possible options, certain factors can intensify it, as the lack of knowledge, unrealistic expectations, unclear values, pressures from others, social context and lack of support in the decision-choice. An example of a choice requiring involvement of the patient scheduled to receive chemotherapy is the proposal of the insertion of a Central Venous Catheter (CVC). Despite the CVCs ensure greater freedom of movement and are safer for the administration of chemotherapy, patients report negative perceptions, inadequate knowledge and are often concerned about their device. In addition, the perception of self-efficacy of patients in informed choices play a central role in the decision-making process. The main purposes of the study are to verify the occurrence of decisional conflict, to describe the factors influencing it, to assess the knowledge and self-efficacy in cancer patients to whom it was proposed the placement of a CVC for administration of intravenous chemotherapy. Secondary aims are to test the psychometric properties of the questionnaires used. Materials and Methods Single centre cross-sectional study. The Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF) was applied as it provides a framework for developing interventions for decision support, it includes tools for analysis of the factors contributing to decisional conflict and provides tools aimed at improving the quality of decision making. Therefore three self-administered questionnaires adapted from ODSF will be used to assess 1) decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale-DCS), 2) self-efficacy (Decision Self-Efficacy) and 3) knowledge of patients with indication to the positioning of a CVC to receive intravenous chemotherapy. The psychometric properties of the three questionnaires will be tested through exploratory or confirmatory factor analyses. The models will be assessed using several criteria among the following: Chi-square (χ2); Comparative Fit Index (CFI); Tuker Lewis Index (TLI), Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) and the Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR). The quality of the factors will be analyzed through the factor score determinacy coefficients and reliability through Cronbach's Alpha Coefficient. Correlation between the scores of the Self-efficacy Scale and the DCS will be evaluated by Pearson’ correlation coefficient. Discussion: Results from the study will test the psychometric properties of three questionnaires based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. The provision of valid and reliable tools will enable to identify decisional conflicts, their causes, and the interventions that can help to solve them. This will allow developing patient education plans tailored to the needs of individuals in the decision-making process.

Authors and Affiliations

Maria Rosaria Esposito, Michela Piredda, Assunta Guillari, Maria Grazia De Marinis

Keywords

Related Articles

Laboratory and diagnostic test mobile systems: critical issues and perspectives in the field of major disasters

Health Units of the Military Corps of Italian Red Cross (CRI) have proven to be usefully applied in both pace mission (i.e., Operation Ancient Babylon, IRAQ; 2005) and civil (i.e., EUNAVFOR MED Operation; in progress) sc...

Tuberculosis 2020

Tuberculosis (TB) still causes an out-sized burden of morbidity and mortality, remaining one of the human infections with the highest prevalence worldwide. This is calling for efficient measures of prevention and contro...

Biomedicine and Prevention: a Public Health perspective

The twentieth century has been characterized by virulent debates about the causal role of environmental vs. genetic determinants of diseases. At times, these diatribes turned more into ideological rather than scientific...

The ItRC Volunteer Military Corps: Role of Civil Protection and Civil Defense in CBRN Emergencies

Volunteer Military Corps is a fundamental component of the Italian Red Cross Society, an humanitarian organization operating for health and social assistance without discrimination regarding race, nationality, religious...

Psychiatric disorders, social isolation and use of Social Networks in a sample of university students: a pilot study.

Introduction There is some evidence of a strong association between social isolation and depressive and anxious symptoms in college students. On the contrary, there are controversial data on the link between the use of s...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP336297
  • DOI 10.19252/00000007B
  • Views 99
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Maria Rosaria Esposito, Michela Piredda, Assunta Guillari, Maria Grazia De Marinis (2018). Decisional conflict in patients scheduled for insertion of a Central Venous Catheter to receive chemotherapy: protocol for a cross-sectional study. Biomedicine & Prevention, 2018(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-336297