Deconstructing the seductive allure of neuroscience explanations
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2015, Vol 10, Issue 5
Abstract
Previous work showed that people find explanations more satisfying when they contain irrelevant neuroscience information. The current studies investigate why this effect happens. In Study 1 (N=322), subjects judged psychology explanations that did or did not contain irrelevant neuroscience information. Longer explanations were judged more satisfying, as were explanations containing neuroscience information, but these two factors made independent contributions. In Study 2 (N=255), subjects directly compared good and bad explanations. Subjects were generally successful at selecting the good explanation except when the bad explanation contained neuroscience and the good one did not. Study 3 (N=159) tested whether neuroscience jargon was necessary for the effect, or whether it would obtain with any reference to the brain. Responses to these two conditions did not differ. These results confirm that neuroscience information exerts a seductive effect on people’s judgments, which may explain the appeal of neuroscience information within the public sphere.
Authors and Affiliations
Deena Skolnick Weisberg, Jordan C. V. Taylor and Emily J. Hopkins
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678195
- DOI -
- Views 114
- Downloads 0
Cue integration vs. exemplar-based reasoning in multi-attribute decisions from memory: A matter of cue representation
Inferences about target variables can be achieved by deliberate integration of probabilistic cues or by retrieving similar cue-patterns (exemplars) from memory. In tasks with cue information presented in on-screen displa...
Learning affects top down and bottom up modulation of eye movements in decision making
Repeated decision making is subject to changes over time such as decreases in decision time and information use and increases in decision accuracy. We show that a traditional strategy selection view of decision making ca...
Exemplar-based inference in multi-attribute decision making: Contingent, not automatic, strategy shifts?
Several studies propose that exemplar retrieval contributes to multi-attribute decisions. The authors have proposed a process theory enabling a priori predictions of what cognitive representations people use as input to...
Maximizing without difficulty: A modified maximizing scale and its correlates
This article presents several studies that replicate and extend previous research on maximizing. A modified scale for measuring individual maximizing tendency is introduced. The scale has adequate psychometric properties...
The boundary effect: Perceived post hoc accuracy of prediction intervals
Predictions of magnitudes (costs, durations, environmental events) are often given as uncertainty intervals (ranges). When are such forecasts judged to be correct? We report results of four experiments showing that forec...