Defending and Modelling Europe: The Visegrad Group Experience

Journal Title: SocioEconomic Challenges (SEC) - Year 2018, Vol 2, Issue 2

Abstract

In the world of today, the sole economic region with its own institutions (of a suprastate nature), with a coherent economic policy in every respect regarding the almost all European Space, is the European Union. After the last wave on enlargement, Croatia in 2014 and the exit of United Kingdom in 2019 (the famous “Brexit”), with threats from external sources and with even home tensions amongst the 27 Mermber States, the EU needs cohesion and harmonization of different points of view, in order to ensure the functionality of all pieces and “parts” of the its complex economic and social system. In this case, we consider that an import role can play socalled The Visegrad 4 or Visegrad Group ‒ Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland, ‒ on the one hand to defend the achievements of the EU, and on the other hand, to report shortcomings and to improve norms and regulations, favorable for all Members, as in the examples analyzed in the paper. Therefore, we consider that is better to be a sort of counterweight to the global leadership of Bruxelles, in order to maintain the cohesion and a balanced development of the European Union. Even some countries of the group have taken measures considered illiberal forms of democracy and, therefore, leading to euroscepticism, in fact their economies have hugely benefited from the absorption of EU funds. The economic development and the existence of a sound economic infrastructure are the premises for a better understanding of the facts and realities in the European Union and allow to the respective country (countries) to have a grounded opinion and influence the general management of the Union. Everyone has to think and understand the coordination between the local interests of the Member States and what the Regional system needs and intend to do. Exactly, this is the situation in the relationships between Leadership and Management. In the last place, the V4 is supporting, by its experience, the integration of the West Balkans countries within EU and promoting the enlargement process as the most suitable tool of EU influence and image in the region.

Authors and Affiliations

Alexandru Trifu

Keywords

Related Articles

The Impact of Remittances on Children’s Educational Attainment: Evidence from Egypt

People often migrate in order to improve their family’s standard of living. International migration is a widespread phenomenon among Egyptians and remittances can play an important role in alleviating household budget co...

Factors Determining the Success of Small and Medium Enterprises in Tigray region: the Case of selected town Hintalo Wejerat Wereda

Micro and small enterprises and development opportunity have very direct relationships. They require less capital and more labor. SMEs have the capacity to generate a much higher degree of employment opportunity with les...

Nexus between Infrastructure and Tourism Development

Infrastructure is nothing but the prerequisites for economic development. It is not the engine but the wheels of economic development. Since the onset of economic crisis, followed by economic reforms, the importance of i...

Vulnerable Employment is a Socio-Economic Challenge in Indian Perspective

This paper summarizes the arguments and counterarguments within the scientific discussion on the issue of vulnerable employment prevailing in Asia with special emphasis on India. The main purpose of the research is to ex...

Public-Private Partnership in the Implementation of National Environmental Projects

Increasing the risks of climate change, natural and man-made disasters, as well as the manifestation of their negative environmental and economic consequences at the national and supranational levels, envisages the intro...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP452559
  • DOI 10.21272/sec.2(2).13-18.2018
  • Views 119
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Alexandru Trifu (2018). Defending and Modelling Europe: The Visegrad Group Experience. SocioEconomic Challenges (SEC), 2(2), 13-18. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-452559