DERIVATIVE PECULIARITIES OF ODESSA REGION’S DIALECT LEXIS

Apply

DERIVATIVE PECULIARITIES OF ODESSA REGION’S DIALECT LEXIS

Journal Title: Записки з українського мовознавства - Year 2016, Vol 0, Issue 23

Abstract

The article deals with the analysis of the dialect vocabulary of Odessa region from the point of view of its word-building peculiarities: the ways of forming of dialectisms and the peculiarity of using the word-building affixes are being viewed in the article. The research of word formative peculiarities of dialectal lexicon to differentiate the territorial dialects is very perspective. Such research is of great importance for Ukrainian dialects of Odessa region, where you can discover the coexistence of different dialects: the south-western and south-eastern. Having analyzed 600 derivatives from the «Ukrainian Dictionary of Odessa region's dialects» [16], we have found out that most of the derivatives are formed with the help of suffixes (suffixal method). The most frequent used suffixes in the process of creating were the following: -к(а), -ник, -ар(-яр), -к(и), -ак(-як), -ик, -ов, although it is obvious that the usage of suffixes (-ap(-яp), -к(и), -ак(-як)) in literary language is much less frequent than in the dialect speech. Such suffixes as -yт(a), -yш(a), -л(-о), -н(я) are used much more frequently in the dialect language than in the literary one. There was a surprising gap in the amount of derivatives formed by suffixal method and derivatives formed by others : morphemic and nemorfemny methods. For example, there were not words among the analyzed ones formed by the prefixal method. Only ten derivatives are formed by prefixing and suffixal methods (бестáрка, бестáрник, бизрóшка, зáстінок, підпáрок, підпáлок, підлокóтник, відзéмок, відмóстка, вистрéлювати). Only 8 derivatives are formed by word composition method, word composition and suffixal methods and by combining word composition and bezaffiksny methods (близоóкий, близькоглáзий, верхоплáвка, винодєлка, водовозка, водовóзня, круподьóрка, винодєл). There was one derivative formed by prefix-postaffixal and one by prefix-suffixal-postaffixal methods (вихлебтатися, вилітитися). There were derivatives formed by bezaffiksny method: перегул, переріз, перетóк, притула. Only one derivative is formed by lexical-syntactic method (запридух), 14 derivatives-nouns are formed by morphological and syntactic methods (вечíрня, вибіжнá, вісовá, запускнá, зоровá, їздовий, кормовá, кормовий, перекиднá, підвознá, писана, роговá, синовá, стояча).These derivatives occur by using lexical-semantic method: бомба, бородá, востóк, голóвка, грива, кобила, козел, пóлька, серце, шашлик, шия, щур1, щур2. The largest group among analyzed dialectal vocabulary are derivatives-nouns, derivatives-adjectives follow them. Verbs and nouns make the motivating base for formed derivatives, but we have met adjectives and numerals among the motivating words as well. The motivating base for formation of most dialectal words are common words from both dialectal and literary languages. New dialect words rarely appear thanks to other ones (other dialect words).

Authors and Affiliations

L. I. Hatsenko

Keywords

ways of word-building; dialect vocabulary; motivator; derivative; word-building affix

«HE HAS BECOME ANARDENT SUPPORTER OF FOOTBALL FOR ALL HIS LIFE». UKRAINIAN FOOTBALL TERMINOLOGY IN LITERARY WORKS IN THE 30–40-IES OF ХХ CENTURY

Peculiarities of functioning of Ukrainian football vocabulary in literary texts, written in 30-40-ies of ХХ century in Halychyna (short stories by Ivan Smolii, comedy “Korol striltsiv” by Ivan Kernytskyi and the story “T...

EP ID EP385651
DOI -
Views 115
Downloads 0