Determination of Ethanol in Blood and Urine Samples- A Case Study Showing the Significance of (i) Application of One Method Over the Other and (ii) Inclusion of Uncertainty of Measurement

Journal Title: Journal of Forensic Chemistry and Toxicology - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue 2

Abstract

Drunken drivers in India always pose a high risk to other users of the roads. Nearly 0.14 million people lost their lives every year in last three years in India, which is more than all casualties of wars of India [6]. Statistics derived from postmortem reports from road traffic fatalities in various countries show that 20-50% of drivers had been drinking alcohol before the crash and level of consumed alcohol in their body was above the legal limit for driving [2,3]. The influence of alcohol or drugs, many a times, goes to the extent that driver becomes incapable of having control of vehicle leading to the ill fate [2,3]. Seeing the intensity of the matter, Government of India amended the relevant laws from time to time to make it more stringent to deter the offenders. The Motor Vehicle (Amendment) Bill 2016 is such an effort by the Government of India, which was approved by the Union Cabinet of India on 3rd of August 2016 [7]. Such cases, when passes through the process of Criminal Justice Delivery System, the quantity of ethanol determined by a forensic chemist in blood sample of the accused plays a vital role in fair trial. There are several methods available for determination of quantity of ethanol in blood and urine samples. Two such methods were used for ethanol determination in blood and urine samples by the authors. The objective of this paper is to describe the preferential selection of one method over the other in some cases and inclusion of the value of uncertainty of measurement while reporting the result. The available blood and urine samples were analyzed to determine the ethanol contents with the help of two methods. The contents of ethanol determined with two methods were found different to the extent of about 20 to 30 mg%. The results of the method with lower values were found justified with the case history and were reported along with inclusion of value of uncertainty of measurement. Keywords: Ethanol; Cavett Cup; Kojelka-Hine Apparatus; mg%; UOM-Uncertainty of Measurement.

Authors and Affiliations

Keywords

Related Articles

Forensic Applications of IR/FTIR

Infra-Red spectroscopy plays important role for analysis of several compounds, metals etc. Its use is readily understood from breadth of its applications. The range of material that can be analyzed by IR/FTIR is essentia...

Sexual Jealousy Leads to Devil’s Butchering: Case Report on Postmortem Mutilation

A murderer may try several methods to dispose off or hide a dead body, so that his crime can remain undetected. The most frequently used methods include burial of corpse in an unusual or impervious place; charring the bo...

Estimation of Zinc Levels in Blood, Liver and Stomach Contents using ICP-AES: A Cross Sectional Autopsy Based Study

Zinc is an essential component of the body, but its excess quantity is harmful and long term intake above upper limits causes acute or chronic toxicity. Normal levels of zinc in serum is 75-120 µg/dL while in blood it is...

Long Drop Suicidal Hanging with Autopsy Finding of Cervical Spine Fracture: A Rare Case Report

Cervical fracture is a rare presentation in suicidal hanging but a common finding in judicial hanging where the person is dropped from a calculated height, resulting in fracture dislocation at the level of 2nd-3rd or 3rd...

Study of Fatal Burn Cases in Relation to Epidemiological and Socio- Economic Factors

Burns are amongst the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the under-developed and developing nations. This study was undertaken to understand the Epidemiological and Socio-economic factors of the fatal burn case...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP478597
  • DOI 10.21088/jfct.2454.9363.3217.3
  • Views 96
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

(2017). Determination of Ethanol in Blood and Urine Samples- A Case Study Showing the Significance of (i) Application of One Method Over the Other and (ii) Inclusion of Uncertainty of Measurement. Journal of Forensic Chemistry and Toxicology, 3(2), 89-94. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-478597