Development of a technology of structuring group expert judgments under various types of uncertainty

Abstract

<p>The study considers the problem of structuring expert judgments formed under conditions of uncertainty of different nature and in presence of conflicting expert evidence. The method of aggregating group expert judgments that are formed under conditions of various types of uncertainty helps synthesize the group opinion, taking into account various forms of representing the preferences of experts (interval, fuzzy and crisp expert judgments). The proposed procedure makes it possible to synthesize a group decision in the event that there is a group or several groups of experts in a group of experts who express their preferences using different forms of expert judgments.</p><p>This approach allows reflecting accurately the expert preferences regarding the object being analysed, without restricting the experts to a rigid form of presenting assessments.</p><p>In order to analyse the obtained expert information and to get individual expert ratings of the analysed objects, the method of pairwise comparison and its modification were used in the study.</p><p>It has been established that for the aggregation of crisp expert estimates, more precise combined results can be obtained by applying rules for redistributing conflicts of the theory of plausible and paradoxical reasoning. To aggregate interval expert judgments, one of the combination rules of the theory of evidence is recommended. It has been determined that in order to improve the quality of the aggregate results, it is advisable to establish a procedure for combining expert inputs, for example, taking into account the degree of dissimilarity and the structure of expert evidence.</p><p>The obtained results are intended to help improve the quality and efficiency of the processes of preparing and making decisions while solving the problems of analysing and structuring expert judgments.</p>

Authors and Affiliations

Igor Kovalenko, Alyona Shved

Keywords

Related Articles

Development of portable dc voltage calibrators with additive offsets adjusting

<p>Improvement of portable equipment for controlling the DC voltage measuring channels of cyber-physical systems at the operating sites is proposed. Additive offsets and drifts make a dominant contribution to the error o...

Modeling the process of oil displacement by a heat carrier considering the capillary effect

<p>The manuscript is aimed at improving the mathematical model of oil production in a heterogeneous environment with the use of a thermal mode of displacement considering the action of capillary effect. We have construct...

Substantiation of correctness and advantages of Lenstra factorization method on Edwards curves

<p>The factorization problem, which is the basis for many classical asymmetric cryptosystems (RSA, Rabin, and others) and a cryptographically strong generator of pseudo-random sequences (PBS), has been investigated in th...

Establishing the dependence of pollutant concentration on operational conditions at facilities of an oil­and­gas complex

<p>Environmental impact of gas burning parameters during operation of the gas pumping units of compressor stationswas studied. Simulation of the NO<sub>2</sub>, NO and CO dispersion zone at the excess air coefficients of...

Reduction and optimal performance of acyclic adders of binary codes

<p>The conducted studies have established the prospect of increasing productivity of computing components, in particular, combinational adders, based on applying principles of computation of digital signals of the acycli...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP527981
  • DOI 10.15587/1729-4061.2018.133299
  • Views 75
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Igor Kovalenko, Alyona Shved (2018). Development of a technology of structuring group expert judgments under various types of uncertainty. Восточно-Европейский журнал передовых технологий, 3(4), 60-68. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-527981