Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block-A randomized, double blind, prospective study

Journal Title: Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences - Year 2017, Vol 5, Issue 4

Abstract

Abstract: Different adjuvents are used with local anesthetics to improve quality of peripheral nerve blocks. We evaluated the effect of addition of dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block with respect to onset of sensory and motor blockade and duration of blockade and analgesia. Sixty patients of ASA grade I and II, aged 18-60 yrs of either sex scheduled for upper limb surgeries under supraclavicular brachial plexus block were randomly divided into 2 equal groups. Patients in group R (n = 30), received 30 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine with 1ml normal saline (control) and in group RD (n = 30), received 30 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine with 1 ml (100µg) dexmedetomidine. The onset and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia were analyzed in both the groups. Statistical analysis done with Medcalc software and p value<0.05 taken as significant. The mean time of onset of sensory blockade were 5.5±0.94 min and 3.1±0.80 min respectively in group R and RD. Whereas time of onset of motor blockade were 12.27±1.84 min and 6.47±0.94 min respectively in group R and RD. The durations of sensory and motor block were 459.33 ± 19.38 and 369 ± 18.45 min respectively in group R, whereas they were 695 ± 11.06 and 657 ± 18.27 min respectively in group RD. The duration of analgesia was 487.33± 16.01 min in group R compared to 719.33 ± 11.26 min in group RD (p<0.001). Statistically significant difference was present in respect of onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade and duration of analgesia between 2 groups. We conclude that in supraclavicular brachial plexus block addition of dexmedetomidine in ropivacaine shorten the onset of sensory and motor block and prolongs the durations of sensory and motor block and also increase duration of analgesia. Keywords:Dexmedetomidine, Supraclavicular brachial plexus block, Ropivacaine

Authors and Affiliations

Shikha Goyal, Anjul Agarwal

Keywords

Related Articles

Protective Effect of Ethanolic Extract of Curcuma Longa on Learning and Memory in Restrain Stressed Mice

Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ethanolic extract of Curcuma longa (CLE) on learning and memory in restrained stress induced cognitive dysfunction in male albino swiss mice. Eight groups of mice were...

Recent advances in cancer pain management

It is important to control of malignant pain and a related symptom is in cancer patients. To achieve the adequate pain control and best quality of life for patients, oncologists and palliative care clinicians must work t...

A Preliminary Report: Which Patients May Be Candidate For Intrathecal Baclofen Pump?

Our aim is to emphasize appropriate patient selection for intrathecal baclofen (ITB) therapy in those suffering from severe spasticity despite various non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions. The study incl...

Data Analysis of 595 Cases Poisoning Cases in Karad- A 3 Years Retrospective Study

Poisons are substances when sufficiently absorbed, cause disturbances to organisms, usually by chemical reaction or other activity on the molecular scale. In this 3 years retrospective study from Jan 2010 to Dec 2012, to...

A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Dexmedetomidine as Intrathecal Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Hemodynamic Stability and Postoperative Analgesia in Gynecological Surgeries

Abstract: Many adjuvants have been used with local anesthetics in spinal anesthesia but none has been found ideal. We have conducted this prospective randomized double blind study to evaluate the effect of intrathecal de...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP372268
  • DOI -
  • Views 54
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Shikha Goyal, Anjul Agarwal (2017). Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block-A randomized, double blind, prospective study. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences, 5(4), 1663-1667. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-372268