Diagnostic Scores for Appendicitis: A Systematic Review of Scores’ Performance

Journal Title: Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research - Year 2014, Vol 4, Issue 2

Abstract

Aims: Several scoring systems have been developed for diagnosis of appendicitis. This study aims to systematically explore how those scores were derived and validated, and to compare their performance. Study Design: Systematic review. Place and Duration of Study: We searched Medline from 1949 and EMBASE from 1974 to March 2012 to identify relevant articles published in English. Methodology: Information about model development and performance was extracted. The “risk of bias” assessment tool was developed based on a critical appraisal guide for clinical prediction rules. Calibration (O/E ratio) and discrimination (C-statistic) coefficients were estimated. A meta-analysis was applied to pool calibration coefficients and C-statistics. Results: Forty-four out of 468 studies were eligible. Of these, 14 developed or modified diagnostic scoring systems and 30 validated existing models. Four scores had been most frequently validated, i.e., Alvarado, modified Alvarado, Fenyo, and Eskelinen. Among them, only the Eskelinen model was derived based on a multivariate regression whereas the rest used univariate or non-statistical methodology. All studies reported very good but imprecise calibration. For discrimination, the pooled C-statistics for these corresponding scores were 0.77, 0.86, 0.81, and 0.84 respectively. In the external validation, the discriminative performance decreased about 25.3% and 10.1% for the Alvarado and Fenyo scores respectively. Conclusion: The research methods for scoring systems of appendicitis were inconsistent. More efficient scoring systems which have been internally and externally validated are required.

Authors and Affiliations

Chumpon Wilasrusmee, Thunyarat Anothaisintawee, Napaphat Poprom, Mark McEvoy, John Attia, Ammarin Thakkinstian

Keywords

Related Articles

Predictors of Health-related Quality of Life and Self-care in a Large Sample of Spanish Adults with Diabetes Mellitus

Objective: To assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and self – care behaviors in a large sample of diabetic patients (DPts) and to examine which patients’ characteristics influence on them. Methods: This cross -...

Prediction of Intrauterine Growth Restriction in High Pulsatility Index of Uterine Artery

Introduction: Intrauterine growth restriction is a significant cause of neonatal mortality. The uterine artery Doppler waveform becomes transformed into a high flow with low resistance at 22-24 weeks. The apt way to redu...

Knowledge and Attitude of Diabetic Patients towards the Oral Complications of Diabetes Mellitus and Factors Associated with Their Knowledge in Khartoum State, Sudan

Background: Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic long term condition, affecting all age groups. Uncontrolled diabetes can lead to serious oral complications ranging from acute to chronic, which manifest in several ways and can...

“Toxic Butts”: Key Performance Indicators from a California Statewide Social Media Campaign for Tobacco Control

Background: The “Toxic Butts” campaign was funded by the California Tobacco Control Program as part of a tobacco product waste toolkit. The campaign was to function as a case study, helping to establish best practices fo...

Prevalence and Factors Associated with Use of the Female Condom among Undergraduates in a University in Enugu, South East Nigeria

Background: The female condom remains the only female-initiated means of preventing both pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, including HIV. Unfortunately uptake in the West and in some developing countries has...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP348549
  • DOI 10.9734/BJMMR/2014/5255
  • Views 56
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Chumpon Wilasrusmee, Thunyarat Anothaisintawee, Napaphat Poprom, Mark McEvoy, John Attia, Ammarin Thakkinstian (2014). Diagnostic Scores for Appendicitis: A Systematic Review of Scores’ Performance. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, 4(2), 711-730. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-348549