Differences between Feminist and Mainstream Approaches to Social Science, Most Notably in Sociology, Political Science, Anthropology and History

Journal Title: JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN HUMANITIES - Year 2014, Vol 2, Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract - It is widely accepted among feminists that feminism implies a distinctive approach to inquiry. And for some this is not just a matter of the grounds on which topics are selected for investigation, or even of the theoretical ideas that are treated as relevant. Rather, feminism is taken to carry distinctive methodological and epistemological implications (Hammersley, 1995: 45). In this paper I want to assess the arguments for a distinctively feminist methodology. My first task, though, is to provide some detail about what this is taken to entail. There are, of course, important differences among feminists who have written on this topic, and in the course of the discussion I will highlight some of these. I certainly do not want to suggest that what I am assessing is a single position, nor am I claiming to represent the basis on which most feminists actually do research. My main concern here is solely with feminist writing about methodology.

Authors and Affiliations

Senka Ena Majetic

Keywords

Related Articles

THE WAY IT LOOKS: CONTEXTUALIZING EARLY PAINTINGS IN TRADITIONAL ART OF PREGOLD COAST ERA

Documentation of paintings in the history of African art in regions south of the Sahara is rare. It is rather common reading of wood sculpture and other three dimensional works as the main stay of African art. However ar...

CULTURAL CAPITAL: A KEYWORD OR A CATCHWORD?

The concept of cultural capital is highly popular in the social sciences and humanities. Yet, its usefulness as a research tool is often taken for granted. Meanwhile, the present paper attempts to show that if anything s...

The Concept of 'Grammatical Words' as Reflected in the Works of Rabbi Abraham ibn Ezra

The group of grammatical words1 used by Rabbi Abraham ibn Ezra in his writings overall2 includes the words ’bl “but”, ’wlm “but, however", ’”r “after", ’k “but, only", ’kn “indeed", ’l “to”, ’”l “at", ’šr “that”, b “in",...

The Glorification of Academic Imperialism in an African Citadel of Learning: A Textual Analysis of Lekan Are's The Challenge of The Barons

The Berlin Conference of 1884/85 which culminated in the scramble for and partitioning of African continent into various states by some European nations, brought negative implications to the psyche of Africans. The parti...

RELEVANCE OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION TO CURRICULUM THEORY AND DEVELOPMENT IN NIGERIAN EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM

Attempts of undue separation of the philosophy of education and curriculum theory and development in the teaching of systematic functional education have been seriously criticized. This has been so because it is not in t...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP654797
  • DOI 10.24297/jah.v2i1.414
  • Views 202
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Senka Ena Majetic (2014). Differences between Feminist and Mainstream Approaches to Social Science, Most Notably in Sociology, Political Science, Anthropology and History. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN HUMANITIES, 2(1), 47-50. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-654797