Differential diagnostics, severe versus profound hearing loss in infants and toddlers using ASSR ‘‘ CE-Chirp’’

Journal Title: Polski Przegląd Otorynolaryngologiczny - Year 2013, Vol 2, Issue 4

Abstract

[b]Introduction: [/b]One of the most difficult tasks in pediatric audiology is to assess the precisely hearing level of the child in the first months of life. It is rather impossible to acquire frequency specific responses precisely in hard of hearing infants using tone bursts or clicks. But the distinction between severe and profound hearing loss is clearly meaningful and significant with regard to aural rehabilitation and selection of powerful hearing aids versus cochlear implants. In recent years, the ‘‘CE-Chirp’’ stimuli have been introduced in the ‘‘Interacoustics’’ ASSR system to maintain a larger quantity of hair cells in the response, thus making the response more robust and easier to detect. Input compensation of ‘‘CE-Chirp’’ allows low frequency acoustics segments to initiate before high frequencies, causing sequential frequencies to reach their destinations along the basilar membrane at the same time. Clinical testing involving subjects with normal hearing demonstrates that the Chirp ABR is 1.5–2.0 times larger than the corresponding click ABR. But there is a lack of research that shows convincing advantages of chirps in testing hard of hearing infants. Aim: The aim of the study has been to assess hearing levels with ASSR ‘‘CE-Chirp’’ in children who have no, or residual response in the first year of life. [b]Materials and methods: [/b]Eleven children were included in the study. These patients had no, or residual response between the ages of 3 and 6 months, in click and tone bursts ABR. Eight infants were referred for cochlear implantation. In the ages between 12 and 18 months we tested these hearings using Interacoustics ASSR ‘‘CE-Chirp’’. [b]Results: [/b]Six patients of the tested group were recognized as severely hard of hearing (mean 60–80 dB nHl), three as profoundly hard of hearing (90 dB nHl). In two children we did not find any response. Conclusions: The ABR tone bursts and click tests can overestimate hearing loss in the first six months of life We can evaluate the quantity of hearing more exactly in infants and toddlers, with ASSR ‘‘CE-Chirp’’.

Authors and Affiliations

Przemysław Śpiewak, Jerzy Adamek, Beata Śpiewak

Keywords

Related Articles

Application of endoscopy in middle ear surgery

Endoscopy has been used in middle ear surgery for 20 years. Ear endoscopy assists usually the standard microscopical procedure, but more often constitutes an independent visualisation method. Many authors claim that endo...

Zapalenie ucha zewnętrznego

Treatment of otitis externa has changed and developed along the years. Pain and discomfort caused by the inflmmation of the external ear canal impells the patient to seek medical care. Etiology of otitis externa is most...

Wybrane zagadnienia z diagnostyki i leczenia chorób błony śluzowej jamy ustnej

Autorzy – na podstawie bieżącego piśmiennictwa oraz własnej praktyki klinicznej – przedstawili najczęściej występujące zmiany błony śluzowej jamy ustnej, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem ich obrazu klinicznego, diagnostyki...

Preoperative algorithm for sinus lift procedure

The dental implants are becoming more used by dental surgeons to perform prosthetic rehabilitation, therefore sinus lift procedure is more often performed. The complications after this procedure by the ENT specialists wi...

Antibiotic therapy of acute upper respiratory tract infections and otitis media in adults

An estimated 50% of antibiotic prescriptions may be unjustified in the outpatient setting. Viruses are responsible for most acute respiratory tract infections. The viral infections are often self-limiting and only sympto...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP51179
  • DOI -
  • Views 157
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Przemysław Śpiewak, Jerzy Adamek, Beata Śpiewak (2013). Differential diagnostics, severe versus profound hearing loss in infants and toddlers using ASSR ‘‘ CE-Chirp’’. Polski Przegląd Otorynolaryngologiczny, 2(4), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-51179