DISCOURSE AS A SOCIO-CULTURAL PHENOMENON

Abstract

Introduction. The article deals with the problem of discourse. The main trends of the doctrine of the discourse in historical perspective have been considered. It has been shown that the realities of modern life are the discursive manifestation through information and communication. The attention has been paid to the diversity of these approaches and definitions due to the ambiguity of defining the subject of study. Purpose. The objective of this work is to show that the use of discourse is not limited by linguistics, politics and etc. Discourse is a socio-cultural phenomenon with a certain empowered resource. Methods. In the article a method of comparative analysis and the methodological principles of power analysis of M. Foucault and P. Bourdieu have been used. Results. On the basis of works of M. Foucault and P. Bourdieu it has been proved that discourse is a socio-cultural phenomenon, which serves as a complex of communication events occurring between entities, which in their turn are endowed with a certain status and play relevant role games in the communication process. It is quite important to note that in today's society not institutions and norms become increasingly important, but directly acting personalities and their discourses: image, images, etc. The attention has been paid to the fact that discourse is always authoritative resource which at the present stage of human development is based on the availability of information and mass communication. Originality. It has been shown that in the modern world discourse serves as internalization of external determinations, and becomes on the one hand mental, deep, and on the other hand there are institutional restrictions ways to think, act and speak, which is entirely subject to conscious transformations and changes. Discourse as a set of acquired dispositions, is structured so that it reflects the social conditions in which it was learned. Conclusion. Discourse as social, socio-cultural phenomenon is over a human being as the institutions demand to recognize and to submit to the requirements of environment by means of socialization and adaptation. Thus, namely through such concept as discourse we can reveal the symbolic mechanisms of organization of the social world.

Authors and Affiliations

Olga BOYKO

Keywords

Related Articles

PHILOSOPHY OF HUMANISM AND DEMOCRACY – THE QUINTESSENCE OF SOCIO-HUMANISTIC FORMATION OF A PERSON AND THE WORLD CIVILIZATION

Development and enforcement of humanistic and democratic ideas and values that are fundamental to the socio-humanistic formation of a person and the world civilization and make the content and objectives of the philosoph...

SOCIAL DEVITALISATION AS A CONSEQUENCE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA OF UKRAINIAN SOCIAL SPACE DONE BY THE SOVIET IDEOLOGY

Introduction. It is noted that trauma of Ukrainian social space was caused by prolonged domination of Soviet ideology, when cultivating fears and phobias, and individuals were forced to flee from "the Power’s achievement...

POST-INDUSTRIAL DIMENSION OF UKRAINIAN SOCIETY

Introduction. Modern society is on the stage, which is characterized by new economic and ideological positions. With the development of information in today’s world, humanity is moving to a new stage of development, name...

Categorical imperative in measuring of vital wisdom.

The article is dedicated to establishment of possibilities of internal (psychological) indoor and the will to humanity humanize (spiritualize) the outside world through the understanding of effective forms of interaction...

PSYCHOLOGISM AS А HISTORICO-PHILOSOPHICAL PHENOMENON

Introduction. The end of the XXth – the beginning of the XXIth century brought a brand new essence to the problem of psychologism. The studies in logic, philosophy of consciousness, cognitive sciences came to focus on “n...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP291453
  • DOI -
  • Views 101
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Olga BOYKO (2017). DISCOURSE AS A SOCIO-CULTURAL PHENOMENON. Вісник Черкаського університетету. Серія Філософія, 1(1), 83-88. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-291453