Discrepancies, deficiencies and suggested amendments in ‘Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Malaria in India 2011’

Journal Title: Progress in Health Sciences - Year 2012, Vol 2, Issue 2

Abstract

Introduction: ‘Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Malaria in India 2011’ and its earlier edition have highlighted clinical issues pertaining to conceptual, practical and challenging scenarios in diagnosis cum treatment of common malaria parasites. Purpose: To critically analyze ‘Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Malaria in India 2011’ and its edition of year 2009 for their contents, quality, comparison, drug dosage schedules, discrepancies, guiding principles and deficiencies for suggestive timely remedial measures. Materials and methods: Steps included statistical analysis of each recommended antimalarial tablet against its universally accepted drug dosage, comparative study of ‘guideline 2011’ with ‘guideline 2009’, development of new user friendly simplified tables for suggested inclusion in new/revised edition of ‘guideline 2011’ and making specific recommendations for evidence based corrective measures cum policy initiatives. Results: Critical scientific analysis of these guidelines illustrate greater need of efforts for learning, expertise, experience, research and shared knowledge based amendments thereby enabling those entrusted to deal with routine and critical care of malaria patients as well as prevention among those likely to be exposed to such infections. Conclusion: Study has underlined (a) avoidable discrepancies in therein applied principles of drug dosage and related recommended scheduling for various age groups; (b) deficiencies in the guidelines; and (c) study based recommendations for observing consensus based approach and inclusion of agreed necessary changes in amended ‘guidelines 2011’ or its new edition for better clinical decision making in the larger interest of malaria patients in India after due consideration and rigorous examination of the points of concern and suggested amendments through multidisciplinary consultative process

Authors and Affiliations

R Gumashta, J Gumashta

Keywords

Related Articles

Development of an educational research software with advisory role in the clinicobiochemical evaluation of amenorrhea

Introduction: Amenorrhea is a symptom of a variety of disorders and dysfunctions. Historically, there have been many practical difficulties associated with the diagnosis of amenorrhea due to the complex nature of the ova...

The role of understanding the brain death concept in individuals’ willingness to donate organs – preliminary study

Purpose: The study tries to explore if there is an association between the level of understanding the brain death concept and the willingness to organ donation. Methods: For the purpose of that study the two-step method...

 Alcohol consumption among medical university students

 Introduction: Due to their future job and the specificity of academic classes, the exposure to alcoholic beverages constitutes the specific threat in the case of medical university students. Despite this, the frequ...

Relationship between type 2 diabetes and periodontal disease

Purpose: To assess periodontal status in type 2 diabetes (T2D) to compare the findings between diabetic and non-diabetic individuals using Community Periodontal Index (CPI) and Oral Hygiene Index (OHI). Associations betw...

Validation of the Polish version of the Anderson and Dedrick Trust in Physician scale

Purpose: The aim of this study was to validate the Trust in Physician Scale (TPS) for Polish patients. Materials and Methods: The validation of a Polish-language version of Anderson and Dedrick’s TPS was performed with a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP75834
  • DOI -
  • Views 96
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

R Gumashta, J Gumashta (2012). Discrepancies, deficiencies and suggested amendments in ‘Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Malaria in India 2011’. Progress in Health Sciences, 2(2), 144-152. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-75834