Disparity of Sentence Determination by Judges Regarding Decisions Below the Minimum in Narcotics Crimes

Journal Title: International Journal of Social Science And Human Research - Year 2024, Vol 7, Issue 05

Abstract

This research aims to explain differences in judges' decisions regarding the imposition of sentences below the minimum in narcotics offense cases. The main focus of this research is the judge's thoughts when adjudicating narcotics cases which causes inequality in sentencing and determining appropriate sentencing criteria that the judge can take into consideration so that there is no inequality in punishment in the future. Inequality in sentencing has the meaning of giving different sentences to convicts in cases that are similar or almost similar in terms of the level of crime, whether they are carried out simultaneously or not, without justifiable reasons. This research aims to identify and analyze the basic considerations of judges in determining sentences against drug offenders, as well as identifying the factors that influence judges' decisions against perpetrators, especially those who violate Article 112 and Article 114 Paragraph 1 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. The data used in this research is secondary data in the form of judge's decisions. The analytical approach used is the case approach and criminal law concepts. The research results show that the judge considered the evidence presented in accordance with the procedures regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code in deciding the case. Factors that influence the judge's decision include legal aspects, characteristics of the perpetrator, and subjective factors of the judge concerned.

Authors and Affiliations

Reni Ayu Wulandari, Handoyo Prasetyo

Keywords

Related Articles

Umurenge Sacco Financial Services and Social Wellbeing of its Members in Rwanda a Case of Ijabo Ngeruka Umurenge Sacco in Bugesera District

Background: The main objective of this study is to investigate how financial services offered by Umurenge Sacco impact the overall welfare of its members, focusing on Ijabo Ngeruka Umurenge Sacco in Bugesera District. Th...

Implementation of the Polluters Pays Principle in The Case Of PT. Kumai Sentosa

The Polluters Pays Principle is the obligation of environmental polluters to bear the costs of environmental losses and the costs of environmental restoration in the amounts specified in statutory regulations. This princ...

The Importance of Seeking Knowledge in Islam: A Literature Review

This study discusses the importance of seeking knowledge in Islam by conducting a literature review. The background of this research is the obligation in Islam to seek knowledge as part of worship. This study aims to exp...

Education and identity: reflections on tutoring at the Metropolitan Polytechnic University of Hidalgo

The project aims to analyze whether the teacher's profile has any influence during the development of the tutorial action in the educational program of Information Technology Engineering of the Metropolitan Polytechnic U...

Unpacking Teachers’ Roles in the implementation of New School Curriculum

Teachers play a vital role in the implementation of educational policies and inventions. Without a clear understanding of any programme that teachers have to implement, teachers may not deliver expected outcome. The purp...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP735913
  • DOI 10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i05-103
  • Views 32
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Reni Ayu Wulandari, Handoyo Prasetyo (2024). Disparity of Sentence Determination by Judges Regarding Decisions Below the Minimum in Narcotics Crimes. International Journal of Social Science And Human Research, 7(05), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-735913