Disparity of Sentence Determination by Judges Regarding Decisions Below the Minimum in Narcotics Crimes

Journal Title: International Journal of Social Science And Human Research - Year 2024, Vol 7, Issue 05

Abstract

This research aims to explain differences in judges' decisions regarding the imposition of sentences below the minimum in narcotics offense cases. The main focus of this research is the judge's thoughts when adjudicating narcotics cases which causes inequality in sentencing and determining appropriate sentencing criteria that the judge can take into consideration so that there is no inequality in punishment in the future. Inequality in sentencing has the meaning of giving different sentences to convicts in cases that are similar or almost similar in terms of the level of crime, whether they are carried out simultaneously or not, without justifiable reasons. This research aims to identify and analyze the basic considerations of judges in determining sentences against drug offenders, as well as identifying the factors that influence judges' decisions against perpetrators, especially those who violate Article 112 and Article 114 Paragraph 1 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. The data used in this research is secondary data in the form of judge's decisions. The analytical approach used is the case approach and criminal law concepts. The research results show that the judge considered the evidence presented in accordance with the procedures regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code in deciding the case. Factors that influence the judge's decision include legal aspects, characteristics of the perpetrator, and subjective factors of the judge concerned.

Authors and Affiliations

Reni Ayu Wulandari, Handoyo Prasetyo

Keywords

Related Articles

Legal Views in Indonesia on Children with Problems with the Law

Children are God's creations that need to be protected by anyone because of their limitations. One of the protections provided is legal protection for children who get a form of violence. Violence that children receive w...

The Influence of Academic Supervision, Principal Leadership, and Teacher Pedagogic Competence on Teaching Performance of Public Elementary School Teachers in Martapura District, Banjar Regency

This study aims to analyze the influence of academic supervision, principal leadership and teacher pedagogical competence on teaching performance. This study uses regression research with a quantitative approach which is...

Impact of Social Media Usage & Social Engagement on Physical- Mental Health of Young Employees

Due to the dispensable exercise of social media, young employees have reduced social engagement. The objective of the present study was to find out the impact of the exertion of social media and social engagement on the...

Protection of Electronic Money Saving Customers At the Bank

Currently developing again with the emergence of a new payment instrument in the form of a certain amount of money stored in an electronic media owned by someone, this payment instrument is known as Electronic Money. As...

Sexual Harassment of Women through Social Media in the Modern Era of Indonesian Criminal Law

Crimes of sexual harassment against women continue to occur. This sexual harassment crime is included in the category of sexual violence crimes and is a violation of Human Rights. Where sexual harassment also happens thr...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP735913
  • DOI 10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i05-103
  • Views 55
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Reni Ayu Wulandari, Handoyo Prasetyo (2024). Disparity of Sentence Determination by Judges Regarding Decisions Below the Minimum in Narcotics Crimes. International Journal of Social Science And Human Research, 7(05), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-735913