Disputation of Traditionists with Legal Theoreticians over the Validity of External Meanings

Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2013, Vol 45, Issue 92

Abstract

According to the traditionists (akhbārīs), “inference of theoretical precepts from the external meanings of the Qur’ān and the sunna of the Prophet without reference to the Infallible Imams is not permitted. Also, after enquiry into the sayings of the Imams, if no contextual evidence is found, it has to be ceased and no recourse can be made to the above external meanings.” The reasons that akhbārīs have provided on this claim are varied; however, their most significant reasons are the traditions that they claim to be frequently narrated (mutawātir). This article examines the reasons that the akhbārīs have presented for their claim or attributed to them. The conclusions achieved from this examination include the following: 1. Ḥadīth al-thaqalayn has the capacity to be a reason for both akhbārīs and uṣūlīs; 2. The akhbārīs have not referred to the distortion of the Qur’ān as evidence in this claim; but in the later writings of uṣūlīs such allegation has been made against them, which is an inadvisable allegation; 3. The claim of the akhbārīs is not compatible with the present realities of life in Islamic communities; and their claim is highly ideal but inaccessible.

Authors and Affiliations

Mohammad Hassan Mohammadi Mozaffar, MuḥAmmad KāẓIm ShāKir

Keywords

Related Articles

A comparative study of the similarities and differences between ‘assisting’ and ‘causing’ within two rules: the prohibition of ‘assistance with sins’ and ‘causation’

Assistance with sins’ and ‘causation’ are two important jurisprudential rules with crucial implications. ‘Assisting’ and ‘causing’ as derived from those rules have a lot in common. At the same time, what their difference...

Shī‘ī Versified Jurisprudence in the Last two Centuries

One of the methods of the past scholars for better and faster learning of sciences has been the versification of scientific material. This type of poetry is called ta‘līmī (didactic) in technical terms. Many scholarly ma...

A Critique on the Theory of the Necessity of the Oneness of Consort (Faḥl)

Among the causes for the prohibition of marriage is fosterage, which is one of the most important issues of concern. There is consensus among the jurists of all the Islamic schools in that fosterage is one of the causes...

An analysis and criticism of the arguments for the individuality of the hijab

The hijāb is a religious obligation based on numerous sources and jurisprudential arguments. Some consider the hijāb as an individual and not a social issue, arguing that it essentially does not fall in the sphere of sta...

An Exploration into the Qur’anic Evidence of the Legal Ruling on the Alteration of Allah’s Creation in Newly-emerged Medical Issues

The occurrence of newly-emerged and unprecedented phenomena in various medical fields raises questions as to their legality or illegality. Despite the fact that one of the most important evidences of the jurists in this...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP183843
  • DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v0i0.10699
  • Views 148
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mohammad Hassan Mohammadi Mozaffar, MuḥAmmad KāẓIm ShāKir (2013). Disputation of Traditionists with Legal Theoreticians over the Validity of External Meanings. فقه و اصول, 45(92), 125-145. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-183843