Divergence between individual perceptions and objective indicators of tail risks: Evidence from floodplain residents in New York City

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2015, Vol 10, Issue 2

Abstract

This study provides the first comprehensive analysis of individual perceptions of tail risks. It focuses not only on the probability, as has been studied by Nicholas Barberis and others, but also on anticipation of damage. We examine how those perceptions relate to experts’ estimates and publicly available risk information. Behavioural factors—availability bias, threshold models of choice, worry and trust—are found to have a significant impact on risk perceptions. The probability of tail events is overestimated, which is consistent with probability weighting in prospect theory. Potential damage is underestimated, one reason why individuals do not invest in protective measures.

Authors and Affiliations

W. J. Wouter Botzen, Howard Kunreuther and Erwann Michel-Kerjan

Keywords

Related Articles

Causal explanations affect judgments of the need for psychological treatment

Knowing what event precipitated a client’s abnormal behaviors makes the client appear more normal than if the event is not known (Meehl, 1973). Does such knowledge also influence judgments of the need for psychological t...

A new intuitionism: Meaning, memory, and development in Fuzzy-Trace Theory

Combining meaning, memory, and development, the perennially popular topic of intuition can be approached in a new way. Fuzzy-trace theory integrates these topics by distinguishing between meaning-based gist representatio...

The narrative bias revisited: What drives the biasing influence of narrative information on risk perceptions?

When people judge risk or the probability of a risky prospect, single case narratives can bias judgments when a statistical base-rate is also provided. In this work we investigate various methodological and procedural fa...

Cultivating credibility with probability words and numbers

Recent research suggests that communicating probabilities numerically rather than verbally benefits forecasters’ credibility. In two experiments, we tested the reproducibility of this communication-format effect. The eff...

The irrational hungry judge effect revisited: Simulations reveal that the magnitude of the effect is overestimated

Danziger, Levav and Avnaim-Pesso (2011) analyzed legal rulings of Israeli parole boards concerning the effect of serial order in which cases are presented within ruling sessions. They found that the probability of a favo...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678190
  • DOI -
  • Views 110
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

W. J. Wouter Botzen, Howard Kunreuther and Erwann Michel-Kerjan (2015). Divergence between individual perceptions and objective indicators of tail risks: Evidence from floodplain residents in New York City. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(2), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678190