Effect of Cellular Mobile Phone Use and Cetrizine on Hand-Eye Coordination and Visual Acuity

Journal Title: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research - Year 2017, Vol 11, Issue 9

Abstract

Introduction: Cellular mobile phones are a major cause of distraction especially while driving. The aggressive and inappropriate use of cellular mobile phones has increased the risk of accidents. Similar alerts are available in literature for certain substances and drugs (e.g. second generation anti H1 drug –Cetirizine) which also derange psychomotor performance and parameters of alertness. Aim: This study measured variations in hand-eye coordination and visual acuity due to use of cellular mobile phone in comparison to that of commonly used antihistaminic drug viz., single dose Cetirizine 10 mg. Materials and Methods: It was a single blind, single dose, interventional study, 100 healthy human volunteers divided into two groups. Baseline readings of all volunteers were noted. Group-I (n=50) was Cetirizine group (10mg orally stat), Group –II (n=50) Cellular mobile phone user group. Alertness was tested on hand– steadiness tester (Reaction Time Index = RTI) and on Flicker–fusion apparatus (visual acuity - Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency per second= CFFF/sec). Baseline readings of all volunteers were noted before intervention. Baseline was compared with readings at three hour post-intervention and was analysed by paired t-test. Inter-group comparison of parameters was also done and was analysed by unpaired t-test. Results: The baseline RTI (95.46±41.74, 85.11±39.05) and CFF low and high (40.07±9.970, 40.76±9.309 and 40.42±9.035, 40.48±9.863) respectively, in Cetirizine group and Mobile user group were comparable. The RTI increased significantly (116.4±51.46, 102.8±49.26) in both the groups after intervention. However, there is no significant change in CFF intensity from baseline in either group post-intervention. Conclusion: Concurrent use of mobile phone while performing tasks, showed significant impairment of hand–steadiness which was comparable to that produced by single dose Cetirizine 10 mg and this may be one of the factors contributing to their close association with road traffic accidents.

Authors and Affiliations

Kalpita Ganpat Gawit, Smita Anand Tiwari, Gauri Hari Kasabe, Pradeep Kisanrao Deshpande, Balasaheb Baburao Ghongane

Keywords

Related Articles

Duodenal Biopsy in the Evaluation of Chronic Diarrhoea in Immunosuppressed Patients from a Tertiary Care Center in Southern India

ABSTRACT Introduction: Chronic diarrhoea in immunocompromised patients is due to a variety of causes including opportunistic pathogens that flourish in such a milieu. While stool examination may diagnose some pathogens,...

Resistant Widespread Facial Impetigo in a Healthy Infant with Atopic Dermatitis

ABSTRACT Atopic Dermatitis (AD) or eczema is a chronic and relapsing, itchy skin inflammatory condition in infancy and childhood. The diagnosis is based on pruritus and an eczematous dermatitis with typical presentation....

Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Biodentine, Resin Modified GIC and Hybrid Composite Resin as a Core Material

Introduction: The restoration of a severely damaged tooth usually needs a post and core as a part of treatment procedure to provide a corono - radicular stabilization. Biodentine is a class of dental material which posse...

Diagnostic Utility of Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA) and Calretinin (CAL) in Effusion Cytology

Introduction: Fluid cytology and subsequent utilization of immunocytology on cell block is being used commonly for increasing the diagnostic accuracy in effusion cytology. Aim: To do cytological analysis of fluids and ev...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP362945
  • DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24370.10653
  • Views 55
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Kalpita Ganpat Gawit, Smita Anand Tiwari, Gauri Hari Kasabe, Pradeep Kisanrao Deshpande, Balasaheb Baburao Ghongane (2017). Effect of Cellular Mobile Phone Use and Cetrizine on Hand-Eye Coordination and Visual Acuity. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 11(9), 9-12. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-362945