Effect of management system on nutrient intake and seminal attributes in jamunapari bucks

Journal Title: Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences - Year 2016, Vol 4, Issue 0

Abstract

The present study assessed comparative semen production potential of Jamunapari bucks under stall feeding (SF) and grazing cum supplementation (GS) systems of 10 animals in each system under group feeding and management conditions. SF Bucks received 500 g concentrate pellets and 700 g green fodder/h/d besides ad lib dry fodder for continuous one year. GS Bucks were allowed 4-6 hr daily grazing and supplemented concentrate pellets @ 500 g/h/d. Intake of nutrients by bucks in two groups were calculated, semen were collected using AV method biweekly to assess seminal traits. The apparent digestibility coefficients of dry matter, crude protein and hemi cellulose were higher in feed materials consumed by GS bucks than SF bucks. However, neutral detergent fibre, acid detergent fibre and cellulose digestibility had shown a reverse trend. The overall Least Square Mean (LSM) for intake of DM, OM, CP, NDF, ADF, hemicellulose, cellulose, ME install-fed bucks were 1309.38, 1190.62, 176.99, 728.72, 410.08, 306.11, 266.09 g/day, 7.76 MJ/d, respectively. The respective nutrients intake in GS bucks were 1396.14, 1259.67, 198.87, 685.24, 367.99, 335.99, 211.23 g/day, 8.21MJ/d. LSM for volume (ml), color (1-2 scale), consistency (1-4 scale), mass activity (0-5 scale), initial progressive motility (%), sperm density(106/ml), live sperms (%) and abnormal sperms (%) of semen produced by SF bucks were 0.92, 1.19, 2.86, 4.30, 78.21, 4317.41, 82.96, and 1.77, respectively. The respective values for the semen of GS bucks were 0.69, 1.24, 2.67, 3.64, 72.78, 3183.14, 74.87 and 2.18.Analysis of data revealed that SF bucks performed better (P<0.01) with lower nutrients intake than the GS bucks.

Authors and Affiliations

Natesan Ramachandran, Narendra Pal Singh, Ajaykumar Shinde, Ramkesh Meena, Anil Kumar Goel

Keywords

Related Articles

CRUDE GLYCEROL: BY-PRODUCT OF BIODIESEL INDUSTRIES AS AN ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCE FOR LIVESTOCK FEEDING

Increased concern on greenhouse gas emission, concomitant global warming and decreasing fossil fuels have created the necessity to find an alternative source of energy for the transportation vehicles. Biodiesels is an al...

Studies on feeding green berseem (Trifolium alexandrinum) on growth performance and economics of finisher pigs raised on kitchen waste based diet

Present experiment was designed to study performance of large white yorkshire pigs of the age of about 5 months by feeding kitchen waste based diet. Animals were segregated and kept in 4 different groups comprising of 6...

DETECTION OF METHICILLIN RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AREUS ISOLATED FROM NASAL CARRIAGE OF HEALTH CARE WORKERS BY POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and coagulase negative Staphylococci (MRCoNS) aremajor health problems worldwide. There is a growing concern about the rapid rise in resistance of nosocomialinfections t...

Wild edible mushrooms of Nagaland, India: a potential food resource

Wild edible mushrooms (WEM) are known for its medicinal and nutritional value across the globe. WEM have become one of the most prized after food especially in the developed countries where people are mostly health consc...

Effects of quarry mining activities on the nutritional composition of edible vegetables in Ishiagu, Ebonyi state, Nigeria

The study assessed the effects of quarry mining wastes on the nutritional composition of Cucurbita pepo (pumpkin), Cucumis sativus (cucumber) and Taliferia occidentalis (fluted pumpkin) using standard analytical methods....

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP428189
  • DOI 10.18006/2016.4(Spl-2-SSPN).S23.S28
  • Views 47
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Natesan Ramachandran, Narendra Pal Singh, Ajaykumar Shinde, Ramkesh Meena, Anil Kumar Goel (2016). Effect of management system on nutrient intake and seminal attributes in jamunapari bucks. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences, 4(0), 23-28. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-428189