Effect of Sheep Manure and Phosphorus Fertiliser on Productivity of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Northern Rwanda

Journal Title: Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International - Year 2017, Vol 12, Issue 1

Abstract

Aims: Snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity is low in Rwanda. Investigations were carried out to assess the productivity of Snap bean using pot experiments. Methodology: The experiment was laid out in a completely randomized design with seven (7) treatments: Compost (T0), Cow manure (T1), Sheep manure (T2), Compost with diammonium phosphate (DAP), DAP alone (T3), Cow manure with DAP (T4), Sheep manure with DAP (T5) and control (T6) on Andisol and Oxisol replicated three (3) times. Results: The results showed that the pod yield was the highest in Andisol (2.39 tha-1) and the application of sheep manure significantly (P<.001) increased the leaf area, the number of leaves (P = .01) and the plant height (P= .01). The number of pods, the pod weight and the total pod yield were also significantly (P<.001) different between the fertilizer treatments and the soil types. Treatments with DAP (T3, T4 and T5) showed better development of the leaf area (231.50 cm2, 221.30 cm2 and 231.80 cm2 respectively), increased the number of leaves (9.67, 9.83 and 10.17 per plant respectively), the plant height (270.80 cm, 266.70 cm and 271.70 cm respectively), the number of pods (11.17, 11.33 and 13.33 per plant), the pod weight (10.68, 10.98 and 12.11 g plant-1) and the total pod yield (2.44 tha-1, 2.51 tha-1 and 3.31 tha-1 respectively). Agronomic efficiency (AE) was the highest in Andisol (5.17 kg of snap bean pod yield per kg nitrogen applied) and in pots that received sheep manure combined with DAP (6.52 kg of snap bean pod yield per kg nitrogen applied). Conclusion: Use of sheep manure and DAP could be a potential option for fertilisation of snap bean in Northern Rwanda.

Authors and Affiliations

C. Bucagu, B. Ufitinema, D. Umutoniwabo, F. Niyitanga, A. Karangwa

Keywords

Related Articles

Influence of Deficit Irrigation at Silking Stage and Genotype on Maize (Zea mays L.) Agronomic and Yield Characters

Maize is considered susceptible to drought stress, when occurs at flowering stage. Thus, the development of drought tolerant maize cultivars is of important priority for plant breeders. The objectives of the present stud...

Effect of Mulching on Microclimatic Manipulation, Weed Suppression, and Growth and Yield of Pea (Pisum sativum L.)

Aim: An experiment was conducted in the Bangladesh Agricultural University to study the effect of various mulches on microclimatic manipulation, weed suppression, and growth and yield of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Study Des...

Glyphosate Influence on the Soil Microorganism Sensibility, Physiological Parameters of the Plant, Isoflavones and Residues in the Seeds and Soil

The use of Glyphosate herbicide is the best way to control weed growing when cultivating genetically modified soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] resistant to glyphosate (N-phosphono-methyl-glycine) (GR). However, there hav...

Long-term Effects of Crops Residues Management on Soil Chemical Properties and Yields in Cotton - Maize - Sorghum Rotation System in Burkina Faso

In cotton and cereals production systems, one of the most important causes of soil fertility depletion is the inappropriate crop residues management. Aims: To improve the productivity and soil fertility, crop residues ma...

Performance of Legendary Local Fragrant Rice in Bangladesh

Conventional cooking is just enough for rice hunger but, aromatic rice adds special dimension when cooked for its characteristic distinct flavor. Investigation aimed to evaluate the performance of most preferable aromati...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP317890
  • DOI 10.9734/JAERI/2017/32943
  • Views 71
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

C. Bucagu, B. Ufitinema, D. Umutoniwabo, F. Niyitanga, A. Karangwa (2017). Effect of Sheep Manure and Phosphorus Fertiliser on Productivity of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Northern Rwanda. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International, 12(1), 1-9. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-317890