Effect of the Anesthetic Method on the Outcomes of Ureteroscopy for Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Multi-center Study of the Society of Urological Surgery Aegean Study Group

Journal Title: JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL SURGERY - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 4

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the effect of the anesthesia method (spinal and general) on the outcome of ureteroscopy (URS) in patients treated for proximal ureteral stones. Materials and Methods: Patients, who underwent URS for proximal ureteral stones at various urology clinics in Turkiye, were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the anesthesia method performed; the procedure was performed under spinal anesthesia (SA) in group 1 and general anesthesia (GA) in group 2. Patients’ demographic, perioperative data and complication rates were compared between the two groups in a retrospective manner. Results: There were 309 and 329 patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The mean stone area and Hounsfield unit in GA group were higher (p<0.001 and p=0.007, respectively). In the GA group, the need for double J stent was more frequent (p<0.001). In the SA group, the rate of push-back of stone into the collecting system was higher (p=0.017). According to the Clavien classification system and the others, complication rates were similar between the two groups (p>0.05). The rate of success of URS, which is accepted as complete stone-free status, was higher in the SA group (p=0.041). Conclusion: URS, which is used in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones, has a high success rate, independent of the anesthesia method used. It is important to keep in mind the patient’s comorbidities prior to selecting the anesthesia method and that the stone area and the Hounsfield unit are the important factors affecting the outcomes.

Authors and Affiliations

Fuat Kızılay, Bora İrer, Volkan Şen, Oğuzcan Erbatu, Şakir Ongün, Alperen Yıldız, Önder Çınar, Mehmet Şahin, Mehmet Oğuz Şahin, Ahmet Cihan, Oktay Üçer, Ozan Bozkurt

Keywords

Related Articles

A Case of Iatrogenic Ureter Injury: Recent Diagnostic and Treatment Methods

The ureters are rarely exposed to trauma. Ureteral injuries are generally in the form of iatrogenic, blunt injuries, and rarely penetrating injuries. Iatrogenic injuries often occur during surgical procedures. They do no...

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Positive Urine Cultures: Do Complications Increase?

Objective: Our aim in this study to determine whether positive urine culture is a risk factor for infectious complications in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). Materials and Methods: A total of 958...

Pre-emptive Use of Riboflavin in a Rat Model of Bilateral Cavernous Nerve Injury

Objective: Erectile dysfunction is commonly encountered after radical prostatectomy due to cavernous nerve injury (CNI). We investigated the effects of riboflavin (Rb) on bilateral CNI in a rat model. Materials and Meth...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP421306
  • DOI 10.4274/jus.2123
  • Views 60
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Fuat Kızılay, Bora İrer, Volkan Şen, Oğuzcan Erbatu, Şakir Ongün, Alperen Yıldız, Önder Çınar, Mehmet Şahin, Mehmet Oğuz Şahin, Ahmet Cihan, Oktay Üçer, Ozan Bozkurt (2018). Effect of the Anesthetic Method on the Outcomes of Ureteroscopy for Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Multi-center Study of the Society of Urological Surgery Aegean Study Group. JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL SURGERY, 5(4), 170-175. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-421306