Effectiveness and comparison of reteplase versus streptokinase thrombolytic agents in the patients of acute myocardial infarction

Journal Title: International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health - Year 2017, Vol 6, Issue 3

Abstract

Background: Streptokinase and reteplase are commonly used for thrombolytic therapy in the patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A comparative study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of both thrombolytic agents. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness, reperfusion rates, mortality, and safety profile of two thrombolytics (reteplase and streptokinase) in the patients of AMI. Materials and Methods: The effectiveness of both thrombolytics (reteplase and streptokinase) was compared on AMI patients during hospital stay, at 1-month and 1-year follow-up. The difference of both groups was assessed by Chi-square and Student’s t-test wherever required. Results: A total of 414 patients of AMI were included in the study. No significant difference was apparent between the effectiveness of both thrombolytics agents at 1-month follow-up of AMI patients. Patients thrombolysed with reteplase showed a significantly low mortality (χ2 = 3.96, d.f. = 1, P = 0.0466) at 1-year post-AMI follow-up. The mean age of patients of reteplase group was 56.7 ± 4.95 years and for patients of streptokinase was 53.2 ± 9.19 years (P < 0.001). The mean age of occurrence of AMI in female was 61.0 ± 8.04 years and in male was 52.9 ± 8.39 years (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Both thrombolytic agents have similar effectiveness in the treatment of AMI at 1-month post-AMI follow-up. At 1-year follow-up, the study demonstrated the superiority of reteplase over streptokinase. As a conclusion, there is a statistically significant difference in hospital stay of AMI patients thrombolysed with reteplase as compared to streptokinase.

Authors and Affiliations

Sunil Kumar Goel, Ishita Goel, Sandeep Agarwal

Keywords

Related Articles

&nbsp;Role of laparoscopic surgery for management of duodenal ulcer perforation

&nbsp;Background: The chief support of remedy of patients with peptic duodenal perforation is surgery. With the invention of minimal access procedures, laparoscopy is being used for the treatment of this condition. Obj...

Different strategies for simultaneous repair of aortic coarctation and associated cardiac diseases in adult patients

Background: Coarctation of aorta and associated cardiac disease is complex medical situation. Both requires correction either simultaneous or in stages. A distinct approach is vital in order to bring down the periope...

&nbsp;Job performance among nurses working in two different health care levels, Eastern Saudi Arabia: a comparative study

&nbsp;Background: Nursing job performance reflects the quality of delivered care and consequently patient outcomes, poor job performance is considered a risk factor for patient safety. Aims &amp; Objective: To assess t...

Impact of sleep quality and general health on academic performance

Background: Sleep has many important effects on the human body. One of its most important effects is on one’s memory, where it plays a role in stabilizing perceived information and facilitating generalized knowledge. Obj...

&nbsp;Analysis of consanguineous and non-consanguineous pedigrees related to the mode of transmission of essential hypertension- study based on Serene Threonine Kinase-39 gene Single Nucleotide Polymorphism rs35929607 in a population of Sindh, Pakistan

&nbsp;Background: The consanguineous marriages are very common worldwide with a risk of acquiring a recessive gene mainly in multigenerational tradition of first cousin marriages. In Pakistan, the Muslim majority has mo...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP308554
  • DOI 10.5455/ijmsph.2017.0740906102016
  • Views 59
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sunil Kumar Goel, Ishita Goel, Sandeep Agarwal (2017). Effectiveness and comparison of reteplase versus streptokinase thrombolytic agents in the patients of acute myocardial infarction. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health, 6(3), 568-572. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-308554