Effectiveness of Judicial Review in the Polish Competition Law System and the Place for Judicial Deference
Journal Title: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies - Year 2016, Vol 9, Issue 14
Abstract
The article discusses the effectiveness and the intensity of judicial review in the Polish competition law system. First, it studies whether the judicial review offered by the 1st instance Court of Competition and Consumer Protection in Warsaw (SOKiK) is effective in practice. Next, the article analyzes whether Polish courts tend to defer to the findings of the Polish competition authority, UOKiK. Judgments of the Supreme Court concerning relevant market definition serve as case studies. Finally, the article discusses whether proceedings before the Polish competition authority ensure sufficient due process guarantees, the impartiality of decisionmakers, and the overall expert character of UOKiK’s decision-making process. On this basis the article examines whether there are grounds for the reviewing courts to defer to UOKiK’s findings. The article concludes that currently the review undertaken by SOKiK happens to be superficial and thus ineffective. At the same time, the Supreme Court’s review of the determination of the relevant market is not deferential towards UOKiK’s findings. The Supreme Court substitutes its own definition of the relevant market for that of UOKiK and that of the lower courts. However, the article shows that there are no grounds at the moment for arguing for greater judicial deference. Proceedings held before UOKiK, despite recently introduced improvements, still do not offer sufficient due process guarantees or a division between investigatory and decision-making functions. In addition, UOKiK’s expertise is not sufficient for both institutional and practical reasons.
Authors and Affiliations
Maciej Bernatt
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP319983
- DOI 10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2016.9.14.4
- Views 64
- Downloads 0
Effect of National Decisions on Actions for Competition Damages in the CEE Countries
One of the main objectives of the so-called Damages Directive (2014/104/EU) was to make antitrust enforcement more effective. Although in most EU countries private antitrust enforcement has been possible subject to gener...
Annual Conference on European State Aid Law 2016. Trier (Germany), 24–25 November 2016. (conference report)
On 24–25 November 2016, the Academy of European Law (ERA) hosted in Trier the Annual Conference on European State Aid Law 2016, organised with the support of Jacques Derenne (Sheppard Mullin, Brussels...
Contracts and Automation: Exploring the Normativity Of Automation in the Context of U.S. Contract Law and E.U.Consumer Protection Directives
Given a choice between two systems of contract rules, acourt or legislature may have a normative obligation to adopt the rule that is more susceptible to coding and automation. This paper explores the ramifications of th...
Liability for Anti-Competitive Conduct of a Third Party under EU Competition Law
The article discusses the framework of liability for anti-competitive conduct of a genuinely independent third party as set forth in relevant judgments. It refers to concepts of third party liability in the light of the...
Marketplaces Restrictions and Selective Distribution after Coty Germany
This article discusses the framework of selective distribution agreements within EU competition law following the Coty Germany case and the EU Commission’s 2017 E-commerce report. It argues that the judgment removed, i...