Effects of changing seat height on bike handling
Journal Title: Journal of Science and Cycling - Year 2014, Vol 3, Issue 2
Abstract
Background: According to the Statistical Release by the Department for Transport, in the United Kingdom 19.000 cyclists are killed or seriously injured every year, with losing control being one of the most common reasons. Research on bike handling went under a revival, but it is still inconclusive on how humans balance and control trajectories and direction during cycling. Adjusting body position on a bicycle has been previously addressed with an aim to improve physical performance (Ashe et al., 2003, British Journal of Sport Medicine, 37(5), 441-444) or reduce the risk of injury occurrence (Bini et al., 2011, Sports Medicine, 41(6), 463-476). Based on the research and practice, some authors (Burke, 1994, Clinics in Sports Medicine, 13(1), 1-14) designed guidelines based on kinematics and/or morphological measures to properly set up a bicycle. Seat height has been an issue of interest among researchers (Games et al., 2008, The Engineering of Sport, 255-260; Peveler et al., 2005, Journal of Exercise Physiology Online, 8(1), 51-55), but never with an objective of improving bike handling. Therefore, our aim was to test the effects of different seat heights on bike handling. Methods: 42 participants (18 males (27.1 ± 11.3 years) and 24 females (24.3 ± 7.7 years)) volunteered to take part in this study. Participants were asked to ride a commuting bike for 7 m in the middle of the 60 cm wide cycling lanes as straight as possible. They repeated this task five times at four different seat heights. Initial seat height (100%) was defined as 109 % of the inner leg length. Two lower seat heights (97% and 94%) and one higher (103%) of the initial seat height completed the experimental conditions. Trials at different seat height were carried out in a random order. We assessed lateral deviation from the centre of the lane, steering angle and bike leaning angle (range and standard deviation (SD)). Mean of five trials for each condition were compared among the seat heights by means of repeated measure ANOVA. In case of a statistical significance (p < 0.05), Bonferroni post-hoc tests were used for pairwise comparisons. Results: We found no statistically significant difference for lateral deviation SD (F(3,123) = 0.927; p = 0.430; ω2 = 0.022) and range (F(3,123) = 0.618; p = 0.605; ω2 = 0.015). There was a statistically significant difference for steering SD (F(3,123) = 4.121; p = 0.008; ω2 = 0.091), steering range (F(3,123) = 4.338; p = 0.006; ω2 = 0.096), leaning SD (F(3,123) = 3.006; p = 0.033; ω2 = 0.068) and range (F(3,123) = 5.971; p = 0.001; ω2 = 0.127). The participants perceived subjectively 97% as the most comfortable seat height to cycle at. Discussion: Results of the present study showed that seat height does not the accuracy of completing a trial. However, we have observed that cyclists completed the trial using different mechanisms of bike handling depending on the seat height. Variability of leaning is increased at seat heights set higher than the current recommended guidelines. Practical implications of the present study are that seat height should be set to fulfil other aims, e.g. comfort and efficiency. Further research should focus on training schemes to improve bike handling skills and on the effects of changing upper body position and how this affects bike handling.
Authors and Affiliations
B. Fonda| School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.S2P, Laboratory for Motor Control and Motor Behaviour, Science to Practice, Ltd., Ljubljana, Slovenia. , N Sarabon| S2P, Laboratory for Motor Control and Motor Behaviour, Science to Practice, Ltd., Ljubljana, Slovenia. , R Blacklock| School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom., FX Li| School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP2848
- DOI -
- Views 397
- Downloads 21
The Effects of Varied Terrain and Bicycle Fitting on Aerobic Power Production: Test methodology
Background: Elite cycling occurs over varied terrain and distances, within all of these events the need to maximise performance is of paramount importance. This can be in the form of specific training, nutrition plan or...
Comparing time-trial and time to exhaustion performance
Introduction: Time to exhaustion trials (TTE) at a fixed exercise intensity have been widely used in a laboratory setting to measure endurance performance. However, they have been criticised for lacking ecological validi...
Attitudes towards doping in Spanish competitive female Cyclists vs. Triathletes
The aim of the present study was to know and compare the attitudes towards doping in Spanish competitive female cyclists and triathletes. All the female cyclists and triathletes who competed (U23 and elite) under license...
Physiological characteristics of competitive Brazilian cyclists
The national cycling calendar in Brazil is extensive with numerous regional and state competitions on a weekly basis. Furthermore, several teams now compete in national, continental and international races throughout the...
Incorporating internal mechanical power into performance models in cycling
Background: A number of models have been developed to establish the energy cost of cycling. These models have become better refined to account for the various energy demands, including air and rolling resistances. Among...