Effects of Lower Doses of Dexmedetomidine on Controlled Hypotension During Middle Ear Surgery

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2019, Vol 6, Issue 3

Abstract

Context: Controlled hypotension is required for middle ear surgery to achieve a bloodless operative field which is achieved by dexmedetomidine. Aims: To study and assess the efficacy of dexmedetomidine infusion in lower doses i.e., 0.25 mcg/kg/hr to lower systolic blood pressure below 30% of baseline values, quality of oligaemic surgical field to achieve the targeted SBP in patients undergoing middle ear surgery. Settings and Design: Double blinded Randomised Control Prospective Study. Methods and Material: After obtaining ethical committee permission and patient consent, the study was conducted on 50 patients aged 18 to 60 years belonging to ASA-PS I and II undergoing middle ear surgery, were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group A received dexmedetomidine 0.25 μg/kg/hr as continuous IV infusion. Group B received dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg/hr as continuous IV infusion. Exclusion criteria included cardiovascular disease, hypovolemia, bradycardia, hepatic impairment, pregnancy and lactating mothers, on sedatives and hypnotics, known allergy to dexmedetomidine. Statistical analysis used: Data analyzed- SPSS 22.0 software. Categorical data: frequencies, proportions. Test of significance: Chi-square test. Continuous data: Mean standard deviation. Test of significance: Independent t test. p value: < 0.05- statistically significant. Results: There was insignificant difference in mean HR, mean SBP, mean DBP among both groups. Both groups had excellent surgical field favourable to operating surgeons with similar grading of surgical bleed. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine at lower doses i.e., 0.25 μg/kg/hr can be used safely to yield blood less surgical field in middle ear surgeries by allowing the hemodynamic variations within the physiological range.

Authors and Affiliations

Lakshmi K Swamy

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparison of Buprenorphine Versus Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

Adjuncts to local anesthetics for brachial plexus blockmay enhance the quality and duration of analgesia. Buprenorphine and Fentanyl both are opioids, known to produce antinociception and enhance the effect of local anes...

A Study on Combined Spinal Epidural Labour Analgesia a Comparison between 0.125% Bupivacaine with Fentanyl Versus 0.1% Ropivacaine with Fentanyl

Introduction: The responsibility of the Anaesthesiologist in obstetrics is arguably greater than in any other fields of anaesthesia. Aim: To compare the quality of epidural analgesia of 0.125% bupivacaine with 0.1% ropiv...

Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Post Operative Analgesia in Patient Undergoing Open Appendicectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study

Background: Analgesia is an important concern in the post operative period in terms of complications like delayed mobility, respiratory distress and thromboembolic events. There have been a number of approaches for post...

Evaluation of Intrathecal Dexmeditomedine as an Adjuvant to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Gynaecological Surgeries

Background: Intrathecal dexmeditomedine is being used as an adjuvant to the local anesthetic agents. Dexmeditomedine has sedative and analgesic action. This study was carried out with the aim to observe and compare the o...

Pain on Propofol Injection: Comparative Study of Pre-Treatment with Intravenous Lignocaine, Ondansetron and Fentanyl for the Prevention of Pain

Context: Propofol is a sedative-hypnotic intravenous anaesthetic agent. It causes a high incidence of pain during intravenous injection which leads to patient dissatisfaction. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP619623
  • DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6319.4
  • Views 66
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Lakshmi K Swamy (2019). Effects of Lower Doses of Dexmedetomidine on Controlled Hypotension During Middle Ear Surgery. Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia, 6(3), 721-726. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-619623