Efficacy and safety of post-cesarean section incisional infiltration with lidocaine and epinephrine versus lidocaine alone in reducing postoperative pain: A randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial

Journal Title: UNKNOWN - Year 2016, Vol 17, Issue 1

Abstract

Objective: Aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of incisional infiltration of lidocaine and epinephrine vs. lidocaine only to reduce postcesarean section (C/S) pain. Material and Methods: It was a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical trial that was conducted in two tertiary hospitals in Egypt and included 153 women undergoing C/S under general anesthesia. They were randomly divided into the following two groups: Group I (control group, number=78), in which the wound was infiltrated before skin closure with 20 mL of 2% lidocaine, and Group II (study group, number=75), in which the wound was infiltrated before skin closure with 20 mL of 2% lidocaine and epinephrine. The primary outcomes were the time to first analgesic (TFA) request (minutes) and the postoperative pain scores that were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes included the duration of C/S, onset of mobilization, onset of breastfeeding, duration of hospital stay, local or systemic side effects of lidocaine and epinephrine, postoperative pyrexia, and postoperative wound infection. Results: The pain score determined using VAS after 1 and 2 h was significantly decreased in Group II than in Group I. However, at 4.8 and 16 h, these results were significantly reversed in Group II than in Group I. The cumulative postoperative opioid consumption was significantly less in Group II than in Group I (50 vs. 90 mg). The onset of mobilization, onset of breastfeeding, and duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter in Group II than in Group I, whereas the TFA request was significantly longer in Group II. Conclusion: Administering epinephrine with 2% lidocaine prolongs the anesthetic effect and reduces the opioid analgesic dose postoperatively required, thereby enhancing patient recovery.

Authors and Affiliations

Ahmed A. Tharwat, Amr H. Yehia, Karim A. Wahba, Abd-Elrhman G. Ali

Keywords

Related Articles

Dedifferentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma; clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features of five cases

Objective: Dedifferentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma is a recently defined uterine tumor composed of low-grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma and undifferentiated carcinoma. Herein, we present clinicopathologic, morpholo...

The implications of male human papilloma virus infection in couples seeking assisted reproduction technologies

Human papilloma virus (HPV) is one of the most common viral sexually-transmitted diseases worldwide. The prevalence of HPV is higher in infertile males when compared with fertile men and ranges between 10 and 35.7% in me...

Fertility preservation in Turkey: a global look for nationwide strategy development

As the reproductive technology advanced along with the improved outcome in cancer treatment demands implementing new fertility preservation, developing algorithms on fertility preservation requires tailoring for each soc...

Revaluating the survival effects of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1988 stage IIIA criteria for endometrial cancer

Objective: This study aimed to define factors that affected survival in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 1988 stage IIIA endometrial cancer (EC). Material and Methods: The study included...

The relationship between semen parameters in processed and unprocessed semen with intrauterine insemination success rates

Objective: To evaluate the relationship between semen parameters and intrauterine insemination (IUI) success rates. Material and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted during a 4-year period (2011-2015) on the m...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP379391
  • DOI 10.5152/jtgga.2015.0185
  • Views 40
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ahmed A. Tharwat, Amr H. Yehia, Karim A. Wahba, Abd-Elrhman G. Ali (2016). Efficacy and safety of post-cesarean section incisional infiltration with lidocaine and epinephrine versus lidocaine alone in reducing postoperative pain: A randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial. UNKNOWN, 17(1), 1-5. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-379391