Efficacy of different methods for difficult biliary cannulation in ERCP: systematic review and network meta-analysis

Journal Title: Journal of Surgery : Concepts & Practice - Year 2023, Vol 28, Issue 6

Abstract

[Objective] To assess the comparative efficacy of different methods for difficult biliary cannulation in endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) through a network meta-analysis. [Methods] Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of different adjunctive methods (early or late needle-knife technique, pancreatic guidewire-assisted technique, pancreatic stent-assisted technique, transpancreatic sphincterotomy, persistent standard cannulation technique) for difficult biliary cannulation with each other were identified. The success rate of biliary cannulation and the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) were the outcomes of interest. Pairwise and network meta-analysis and ranking according to surface under the cumulative ranking curve(SUCRA) for all methods were performed. [Results] Eighteen RCTs were identified according to selection criteria, and 2 033 patients were enrolled. The use of transpancreatic sphincterotomy over persistent standard cannulation technique (RR=1.34, 95% CI: 1.02-1.77) and over pancreatic guidewire-assisted technique(RR=1.26, 95% CI: 1.00-1.60)significantly increased the success rate of biliary cannulation. Based on SUCRA ranking, transpancreatic sphincterotomy followed by early needle-knife techniques were ranked highest in terms of increasing the success rate of biliary cannulation. Only early needle-knife technique significantly decreased PEP rate when compared with persistent standard cannulation technique (RR=0.53, 95%CI: 0.30-0.94), whereas both early needle-knife techniques and transpancreatic sphincterotomy led to lower PEP rates as compared with pancreatic guidewire-assisted technique (RR=0.41, 95%CI: 0.17-0.99; RR=0.49, 95%CI: 0.25-0.96; respectively). Based on SUCRA ranking, early needle-knife technique followed by transpancreatic sphincterotomy were ranked highest for decreasing the PEP rate of biliary cannulation. [Conclusions] Transpancreatic sphincterotomy increases the success rate of difficult biliary cannulation in ERCP; early needle-knife technique and transpancreatic sphincterotomy are superior to other interventions in decreasing PEP rates and should be considered as a choice of difficult biliary cannulation.

Authors and Affiliations

Yang QI, Wenfei YAO, Qianyi LI, Wei YAO, Lei KONG, Ruiyun XU, Yuquan WU, Nengping LI

Keywords

Related Articles

Recent advances in subtyping of biliary tract carcinoma

Biliary tract carcinoma exhibits high heterogeneity at the genomic, epigenetic, and molecular expression levels. The patients even with the same pathological morphology and clinical stage of biliary tract malignant tumor...

Surgical treatment strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common digestive disorder with a global prevalence of approximately 13%. The primary surgical options include the 360° Nissen fundoplication, 270° Toupet fundoplication, and 18...

Application of high dose intravenous vitamin C in critical cared diseases

Vitamin C is an essential micronutrient for human and its deficiency will lead to scurvy. In recent years, as a new therapeutic strategy, high dose intravenous vitamin C(HDIVC) has been widely studied in critical cared d...

Clinical study on comprehensive treatment of gallbladder cancer

Early detection of gallbladder cancer is difficult with poor prognosis in late stage. Although radical surgical treatment is the main method to cure gallbladder cancer at present, only less patients have radical surgery...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP750928
  • DOI 10.16139/j.1007-9610.2023.06.010
  • Views 37
  • Downloads 1

How To Cite

Yang QI, Wenfei YAO, Qianyi LI, Wei YAO, Lei KONG, Ruiyun XU, Yuquan WU, Nengping LI (2023). Efficacy of different methods for difficult biliary cannulation in ERCP: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Journal of Surgery : Concepts & Practice, 28(6), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-750928