Empirical Explication of Psychological Space Sovereignty in Indicators of Personality Social Self-Control

Journal Title: Психологічні перспективи - Year 2019, Vol 1, Issue 33

Abstract

The article represents the results of theoretical and empirical study of psychological space sovereignty in the features of social self-control of student youth. The theoretical grounding of the problem concerns the determination issues of psychological space sovereignty, its structural components and effective characteristics of autonomy and success of behavior. It is emphasized that sovereignty of psychological space is condition and result of adaptability, maturity and productivity of personality and interaction success of individuality and society depends on the qualitative characteristics of the formed social self-control of personality. The specification of interrelation between the psychological space sovereignty definition and the social self-control of student youth makes it possible to consider the ability to exercise control over own behavior as indicator of social and psychological adaptation, which compacts the limits of psychological space. The developed program of empirical research, as well as the complex of the used methods of mathematical statistics of the results, allow to specify the theoretical positions in the form of real psychological facts: students with the formed sovereignty of psychological space (high and average level) are more «principled», and hence their orientation on internal experiences in social interaction allows unobstructedly to overcome the negative moments of social and psychological adaptation, and their expressive stability of behavior defines the greater coherence of emotional support of interpersonal interaction; students with unformed sovereignty of psychological space (low level), demonstrate «pragmatism», which blocks the development of adequate system of social self-control, and is expressed in anxiety of social usefulness in interpersonal interaction.

Authors and Affiliations

Irina Havryliuk

Keywords

Related Articles

Theoretical and Methodological Analysis of Life Satisfaction Phenomenon as a Condition of Professional I-Concept Development

The article deals with quality of life satisfaction as one of the main conditions of professional I-concept development. Satisfaction with the quality of life is determined, first of all, by the achieved targets, the ove...

Psychological and Pedagogical Substantiation of the Values of the use of Frobel’s Gifts in the Context of the Modern Socialization of a Child: a Cross-Cultural Experience

The article reveals the value of F. Frebel’s concept in the process of child socialization and its relevance for today. This is due to the fact that the process of socialization of the child in the family is different in...

Psychological Problems of Elites and Masses in Heritage of D. Dontzov and V. Lypynskyj

The article analyzes the main works of ideologues of the Ukrainian national thought of the first half of the twentieth century – D. Dontsov and V. Lypynsky. The problem of the identification of socio-psychological ideas...

Factor Structure of Emotional-Evaluative Characteristics of the i-Concept of Students with a High Level of Personal Helplessness

The article is devoted to the study of emotional and evaluative characteristics of the I-concept of students with a high level of formed personal helplessness. We have outlined the features of the psycho...

Developmental and Professional-Social Impact on Women’s Unconditional Self-Acceptance, Well-being and Quality of Life

The results of theoretical and empirical analysis of woman’s unconditional self-acceptance as a factor of her psychological well-being and quality of life are highlighted in the article. Unconditional self-acceptance is...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP581989
  • DOI 10.29038/2227-1376-2019-33-49-65
  • Views 111
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Irina Havryliuk (2019). Empirical Explication of Psychological Space Sovereignty in Indicators of Personality Social Self-Control. Психологічні перспективи, 1(33), 49-65. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-581989