Employees Productivity: Leadership Types and Employees Motivation: Case Study at Bank Indonesia Padang

Journal Title: Scholars Bulletin - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue 5

Abstract

Abstract:The purpose of this research is to analyze and to know: 1) To know more dominant Leadership Type applied leadership at Bank Indonesia Padang. 2) To know Motivation Work is more dominant Employees of Bank Indonesia Padang. 3) To know the more dominant Work Productivity for Employees of Bank Indonesia Padang. 4) To know the influence of leadership type and work motivation on work productivity of employees of Bank Indonesia Padang, either partially or simultaneously / simultaneously. Unit of analysis of employees of Bank Indonesia Padang. Population amounted to 85 people and the sample Samples taken using Model Lynch counted 44 people. The method of analysis is qualitative and quantitative methods. Quantitative method with multiple linear regression analysis, correlation coefficient and continued with determination analysis (R square), Partial test of hypothesis (t test) and together (test F) with alpha 5% (0,05). Before analyzed first tested the instrument (questionnaire) with validity and reliability test and classical assumption. Result of research indicate that dominant indicator of leadership type is type of participative leader (25,84%) and dominant indicator of work motivation is primary requirement / maintaining life (20,65%). While on work productivity, maturity indicator think more dominant with contribution equal to 26,21%. The result of multiple linear regression analysis shows that the productivity of Employees of Bank Indonesia Padang is influenced by the leadership type which is 0.1840 points and the work motivation is only 0.4216 points. The result of determination analysis is 0.2383 or 23.83% that the variables of leadership type and work motivation can explain the work productivity of Bank Indonesia employees is 23.83% while the rest 76.17% is influenced by other variables. Types of leadership and work motivation have a positive and significant effect on employment productivity of Bank Indonesia employees Padang either partially or simultaneously. Keywords: leadership type, work motivation and work productivity.

Authors and Affiliations

Agussalim M

Keywords

Related Articles

Review of Organic Pollutants in Wastewater along the Course of River Gwagwarwa and River RafinMalam in Kano State – Nigeria

Abstract:Water samples of River Gwagwarwa and River RafinMalam were subjected to liquid-liquid extraction and analyzed for organic pollutants. The organic parameters were determined using the standard methods of America...

An Overview of Ethical Concerns in Re-Engineering the Human Body

Abstract:Today, the tremendous possibilities that arise with scientific advancements in medicine, biotechnology, and affiliated sciences are distinct and clear. And so are the abuses, negative implications, and ethical d...

Understanding Consumer Decision during Shopping Food and Grocery in Hypermarket: Demographic and Trip Characteristic

Abstract: Retail environment in Malaysia was changed especially in food and grocery segment when hypermarket format was introduced by foreign retailer in 1993. In this paper we tried to understand consumer decision durin...

Numbers Seven Relevance with, Six and Other Ranks

Abstract:The number seven mentioned in many religions, also it’s the lucky number for others.7 is that the solely dimension, besides the acquainted three, within which a vector are often outlined. Seven is that the lowes...

MicroRNA-9 represses sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) in human keratinocytes

Abstract:The protein deacetylasesirtuin 1 (SIRT1) is an established regulator of diverse physiological processes and one of several promising targets for pharmacologic modulation of ageing and longevity. In normal human...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP382265
  • DOI -
  • Views 112
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Agussalim M (2017). Employees Productivity: Leadership Types and Employees Motivation: Case Study at Bank Indonesia Padang. Scholars Bulletin, 3(5), 229-233. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-382265