Environmental safety of application of mineral fertilizer in white wheat production in southern Ukraine

Abstract

The article deals with the ecological safety of application of mineral fertilizers in winter wheat cultivation without irrigation in the Southern Ukrainian Steppe. It has been established that in case of nitrogen fertilizer applying it is necessary to take into account: the availability in soils to available nitrogen forms, the plants nitrogen needs for obtaining the corresponding yield, and also the plants response to different forms of nitrogen fertilizers. The nitrogen fertilizers are readily soluble and easily washable, they are preferably introduced before sowing and used as a source of plant nutrients. Having examined the agroecological assessment of the main traditional types of fertilizers, it can be argued that when we apply 100 kg of ammonium nitrate, the soil is replenished by 84 mg / hectare of nickel, 20–25 mg / hectare of cadmium, zinc and cuprum. Such amount of impurities is safe for soil ecology (Tc > 100), but when the planned doses of fertilizer (larger than 35 kg / ha) are applied, the concentration of heavy metals will increase, and that is potentially dangerous. Concerning the surface water pollution, the greatest danger is the cadmium impurity (water quality, grade 3). The variety of winter wheat Khersons`ka bezosta showed the best harvest results in scientific research. However, the application of urea increased the yield by 22.06%. Fertilizer Efficiency Coefficient (FEC) for granulated mineral fertilizers significantly exceeds the same index for liquid fertilizers, because the yield increases with the lower amount of this applied active substance. It demonstrates the economic efficiency of granulated fertilizers application in agrotechnologies. To that end, ammonium nitrate application to winter wheat of Khersons`ka bezosta and Kiriia is the most effective. Ecotoxicological risk assessment allowed to define the ecotoxicity of the substances and to evaluate the hazards and risks associated with environmental contamination. Ammonium nitrate is the most dangerous among the applied mineral fertilizers.

Authors and Affiliations

V. V. Pryimak

Keywords

Related Articles

ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE OF NEW STRAINS MICROORGANISMS

The article focuses attention on the threat of incurable, difficult to eliminate diseases with pathogens resistant to antibiotics, due to improper, irrational and inappropriate use of antibiotics. This is a global proble...

Conditioning potato tubers as an element of technology quality stabilization

At harvesting, transporting, loading and unloading and sorting potato tubers obtained mechanical damages. As a result of injury, the vacuole shells break and the polyphenols that are in them are oxidized by the action of...

The efficiency of storage of cabbage broccoli depending on the type of packaging

The article presents the results of the application of a 40 mcm polyethylene film, a stretch-film and a stretch-film perforated of 8 mcm for packing the heads of hybrids Ironman F1, Agassi F1 and Beaumont F1 in order to...

The dynamics of soil fertility of arable lands in goshcha district of rivne region

According to agrochemical researches and field experiments of scientific institutions, the change of maintenance of humus, nutrients and reaction of soil solution that leads to agrochemical degradation is observed due to...

Effectiveness useing of the intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the transmission of genetic information in the japanese quail (сoturnix japonika)

This study was conducted in order to introduce new methodological approaches transgenesis quail by using intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). We researched the ability to fertilization and transfection oocytes of qua...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP408310
  • DOI 10.31548/bio2018.03.010
  • Views 72
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

V. V. Pryimak (2018). Environmental safety of application of mineral fertilizer in white wheat production in southern Ukraine. Біоресурси і природокористування [Biological Resources and Nature Management], 10(3), 85-91. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-408310