Escaping the Ivory Tower: Legal Research on Human Rights from a Critical Perspective
Journal Title: The Age of Human Rights Journal - Year 2019, Vol 13, Issue 1
Abstract
This article aims to address some of the criticisms that have been made of human rights research, especially of human rights research conducted by legal scholars. It argues that a conscious and critical approach to the limitations of the 'ivory tower' of legal scholarship on rights is becoming increasingly necessary in a research context marked by the convergence of multiple disciplines, the ever-growing contestation of human rights, and the complexity of the international regime for the protection of human rights. This article outlines three strategies that could be useful for legal scholars to escape from the ivory tower and make a significant contribution to multidisciplinary human rights studies.
Authors and Affiliations
Dolores Morondo Taramundi
The Rights of Pastoralist Peoples. A Framework for their Recognition in International Law
Pastoralists are one of the most poverty stricken and underdeveloped existing human groups in the world. Until now, having remained practically invisible in the eyes of international law, it is desirable to open a debate...
Reasons for the Construction of a Legal Theory of Social Rights as Fundamental Rights
The present research article will relate about the theory of social rights, essentially, it will address the study of some reasons for the construction of a legal theory of social rights as fundamental rights. In this...
The Role of Cultural Heritage in the Creation of a Sense of Belonging among Young Norwegian Turks: Boundary Making and Crossing
This paper discusses the importance that cultural heritage has for Norwegians of Turkish decent when it comes to negotiating both their belonging and the concept of home. The role of heritage in making and crossing t...
The Coherence of Human Rights’ Foundations
To provide foundations for human rights is to prove coherence between focus (what we are talking about when we talk about human rights) and form (in what way we think human rights have a claim to necessity). This paper d...
The Decision by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the Awas Tingni vs. Nicaragua Case (2001): The Implementation Gap
In August 2001, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights reached a landmark and pioneering decision in the field of international indigenous peoples’ human rights law. However, the case did not end there, but entered...