Evaluating European Union Countries on Climate Change Management: A Fuzzy MABAC Approach to the Climate Change Performance Index

Journal Title: Journal of Green Economy and Low-Carbon Development - Year 2024, Vol 3, Issue 1

Abstract

This study was undertaken to assess the implementation effectiveness of climate change management strategies across European Union (EU) member states, employing data from the annually published Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI). The index includes assessments for 36 countries in addition to the EU member states, with evaluations presented through linguistic values. To ascertain the rankings of the EU countries, a fuzzy set approach was adopted, applying the fuzzy Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) method. Weights were derived directly from the original CCPI report. The analysis revealed that Denmark secured the highest ranking, aligning with its position in the CCPI, albeit the ranking sequence determined through the fuzzy MABAC method diverged from the original report’s order. This discrepancy is attributed to the distinct characteristics and specificities of the fuzzy set approach. Sensitivity analysis within this study highlighted that certain criteria exert a more pronounced influence on the rankings, suggesting that heightened emphasis on these specific criteria could enhance the positioning of individual EU countries. Furthermore, this research elucidates the application of fuzzy methodologies in climate change impact mitigation and provides a structured guideline for their implementation. The findings advocate for a nuanced understanding of criteria significance in climate change performance assessments, offering a comprehensive framework for evaluating and improving EU countries' climate management practices.

Authors and Affiliations

Adis Puška, Ilhana Hodžić, Anđelka Štilić, Sašo Murtič

Keywords

Related Articles

Enhancing Medical Waste Management Using T-Spherical Fuzzy CRITIC-MAUT Methodology

In addressing the pivotal challenge of mitigating environmental and health concerns in medical waste management (MWM), this study introduces a novel, integrated multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework employing T...

An Empirical Analysis of the Nexus Between Climate Change Anxiety and Sustainable Consumption Patterns among Turkish Individuals

An augmenting body of research is elucidating the psychological impacts of climate change, revealing a potential positive linkage between climate change anxiety and sustainable consumption through constructive concern. T...

Logistics Customer Service and Sustainability-Focused Freight Transport Practices of Enterprises: Joint Influence of Organizational Competencies and Competitiveness

The paper presents the results of research on the influence of logistics customer service on sustainability-focused freight transport practices of enterprises. Additionally, the extended perspective of the key relation t...

Integration of Sensors and Predictive Analysis with Machine Learning as a Modern Tool for Economic Activities and a Major Step to Fight Against Climate Change

Environmental issues have remained one of the most challenging social-economic impacts on the world and most countries. Tackling these challenges has remained an underlying issue as a concise approach, method, and policy...

Assessing the Impact of Environmental Protection Tax Law on the Market Valuation of High-Pollution Companies: A Quasi-Natural Experiment Approach in China

Based on the financial panel data of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2015 to 2022, this paper takes the “Fee-to-Tax” reform in environmental protection in 2018 as a quasi-natural experiment and employs the Propensi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP731992
  • DOI https://doi.org/10.56578/jgelcd030102
  • Views 28
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Adis Puška, Ilhana Hodžić, Anđelka Štilić, Sašo Murtič (2024). Evaluating European Union Countries on Climate Change Management: A Fuzzy MABAC Approach to the Climate Change Performance Index. Journal of Green Economy and Low-Carbon Development, 3(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-731992