Evaluatıon of Dıgıtal Mammography Devıce Qualıty Control Measurements and Image Qualıty

Journal Title: UNKNOWN - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue 3

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to establish a standard protocol of measurements by taking quality control tests belonging to digital mammography devices widely used in our country. Breast cancer occurs in glandular tissue. For this reason, it is necessary to measure the mean glandular tissue value and follow the standard values. The accuracy of the system has been tested by considering whether the values specified are within the acceptable limit values specified by the EUREF standard. Performing quality control tests periodically will increase the quality of the image and reduce patient doses by minimizing repetitive work. Methods: The measurements were performed on a Fujifilm Amulet Innovality digital mammography system. Contrast detail Pro-Mamphantomand Pro-Mam software to simulate different breast tissues for measurements, Ray SafeXi detector for dosimetry, MTF test for image qualities, Image J software was used to measure the average pixel and standard deviation of the pattern the image. The PMMA phantoms of different thicknesses have the mean glandular tissue change (AGD), contrast-to-noiseratio (CNR), figure of merit (FOM) values and modular transfer function (MTF), detective quantum efficiency (DQE) and noise power spectrum (NPS) graphics are compared. HVL and CNR values of W/Rh filter and W/Al filter are compared. Results: The mean glandular dose was measured as 0.92 mGy on a 45 mm PMMA plate in normal dose mode. When the W/Rh filter is used, the Contrast Noise Ratio (CNR) is 5.1, while the W/Al filter is 4.5. The FOM value with a 45 mm PMMA plate at 26 kVp was measured as 42.905 with the W/Rh filter. When there is a W/Al filter, it is measured as 50.115. Conclusion: The average glandular dose at 45 mm to the EUREF standard should be less than 2.5 mGy, the measured values are within the limit values. Breast dose, air kerma and AGD values increased while CNR and FOM values decreased with increasing breast thickness. When W/Rh filter is used, MGD, FOM and CNR values are higher because the X rays are more cured. Thus, it has been determined that it is possible to obtain a better image quality at a lower dose in the W/Rh combination.

Authors and Affiliations

Özcan Gündoğdu, Rukiye Şanlı

Keywords

Related Articles

Determining The Breast Milk And Breastfeeding Myths Of Postpartum Women

Objective: Common beliefs about breast milk and breastfeeding in society are one of the obstacles to exclucive breastfeeding, especially in the first six months of life. This study was conducted to determine the beliefs...

The Moral Sensitivity of Nursing and Midwifery Students

Objective: In this study, it is aimed to determine the moral sensitivity levels of all nursing and midwifery students who are studying in first and fourth grade students in a faculty of health sciences at Kocaeli Univers...

Determination Of Psychosocial Factors Related To The Body Mass Index In Women

Objective: Weight problem is one of the rapidly growing problems of public health. The purpose of this research is that researching psychosocial factors that is related weight gain in women. Methods: The study is sectio...

Hemifacial Microsomia - A Case Report With Review Of Literature

Hemifacial microsomia (HFM) is a congenital deformity characterised by unilateral deficiency in the volume of hard and soft tissue of face. It is a syndrome predominantly affecting first branchial arch featuring poorly d...

Evaluation Of Postgraduate Education By Questionnaire Results: Experience From Kocaeli University

Aim: The evaluation of postgraduate education is quite important in aspect of rising the quality of scientific works and research environment of Instute. The Institute of Health Sciences of Kocaeli University (KOU HSI) i...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP572420
  • DOI 10.30934/kusbed.455426
  • Views 74
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Özcan Gündoğdu, Rukiye Şanlı (2018). Evaluatıon of Dıgıtal Mammography Devıce Qualıty Control Measurements and Image Qualıty. UNKNOWN, 4(3), 88-94. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-572420