Evaluation of hyperbilirubinaemia as a new diagnostic marker for acute appendicitis & its role in prediction of appendicular perforation

Abstract

Introduction: Acute appendicitis is the most common general surgical emergency and early surgical intervention improves outcomes. The diagnosis of appendicitis can be elusive, and a high index of suspicion is important in preventing serious complications from this disease. The present study was undertaken to assess relationship between hyperbilirubinemia and acute appendicitis to evaluate its credibility as a diagnostic marker for acute appendicitis. Material & methods: The case control study was carried out on 60 patients who were clinically diagnosed as having acute/perforated appendicitis and on 60 healthy volunteers from the community having no signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis. The evaluation of acute appendicitis was done by history taking ,clinical examination and investigations including CBC, Ultrasonography and confirmed by histopathological examination of appendicectomy specimen. For the final analysis various statistical methods like descriptive, crosstabs, chi-square test were applied using the SPSS (version 20.0). Results: Total serum bilirubin level was raised in 43 patients (71.7%) out of the total sample of 60 cases. Of these, 42(70%) cases were positive for appendicitis on HPE (True Positive), and 1(1.7%) was negative on HPE (false positive). Among the 17(28.3%) cases in whom serum bilirubin was not raised, in 3(5%) cases HPE was negative (True Negative), and in 14 (23.3%) cases HPE was positive (False Negative). In 60 healthy individuals mean serum bilirubin was 0.7±0.3 mg%. In 46 cases of histopathologically proved acute appendicitis (non-perforated) the mean serum bilirubin was 1.3±7mg% while in perforated group it was 2.5±1.1mg% (P value was significant i.e. <0.001). Conclusion: Serum bilirubin is an important adjunct in diagnosing the presence of gangrenous/perforated appendicitis. Our findings confirm that hyperbilirubinaemia has a high specificity for distinguishing acute appendicitis.

Authors and Affiliations

U K Chandel, Dhruv Sharma, Surinder Surinder, Prikshit Malhotra

Keywords

Related Articles

A study on uterine and vaginal arteries and their clinical significance

Background: The anterior division of the internal iliac artery usually gives origin to the uterine artery and vaginal artery in common. Uterine artery travels in cardinal ligament to reach uterus by crossing the ureter a...

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder – An unrecognized and neglected aspect of injury

Post traumatic stress disorder is common psychiatric illness. Large number of trauma patients suffers from it. In most patient it remain unrecognized and surgeon don’t give much respect to these symptoms associated with...

Study to identify dietary factors and life style patterns responsible for gall stones among north Karnatakapatients

Introduction:Gall stone disease is common problem in Indian subcontinent.Cholelithiasis has increasingly become a major cause of morbidity, leading to hospital admission and surgery in the developing world. There has als...

Liver injuries- a tertiary rural medical college hospital experience

Background: Liver is the most frequently injured solid intra abdominal organ in abdominal trauma. Exsanguination is the main cause of death due to liver trauma. Although non-operative management of hepatic trauma has bee...

A prospective study of radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder carcinoma

Background: Gallbladder cancer tends to be an aggressive tumor that spreads early and leads to rapid death. The clinical pessimism surrounding gallbladder cancer is because of its late presentation and lack of effective...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP227344
  • DOI 10.17511
  • Views 184
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

U K Chandel, Dhruv Sharma, Surinder Surinder, Prikshit Malhotra (2016). Evaluation of hyperbilirubinaemia as a new diagnostic marker for acute appendicitis & its role in prediction of appendicular perforation. Surgical Update: International Journal of Surgery and Orthopedics, 2(4), 71-78. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-227344