EVALUATION OF NATO INTERVENTION IN KOSOVO BY CRITERIA OF RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT
Journal Title: Journal of International Relations and Political Science Studies - Year 2021, Vol 1, Issue 2
Abstract
During the breakup process of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY), the bloody war started first in Croatia and then in Bosnia (1992-1995), then spread to Kosovo. By 1998, a civil war broke out in Kosovo between the Albanian militia forces, the Kosovo Liberation Army, and the Serbian army, police, and militia forces under the identity of Yugoslavia. As a result of the failure of the mediating efforts by the international organizations, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) had commenced military intervention on March 24, 1999, to stop the increasing civilian deaths and increasing attacks. This intervention of NATO has sparked discussions in both political and academic dimensions but is defined by the Independent International Commission on Kosovo (IICK) as “illegal but legitimate”. Following the NATO intervention, which has been under discussion since the day it was made, the concept of Responsibility to Protect has been accomplished in 2001 with the report prepared by the International Commission for Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS). According to the Responsibility to Protect report, it has set six criteria for a military intervention to be considered legitimate. The report also mentioned that NATO’s intervention in Kosovo contributed to the birth of this concept. In the literature, many scholars claim that is to justify NATO’s intervention in Kosovo. However, the question here is whether NATO’s intervention in Kosovo is in line with the criteria in the report and is legitimate. In this study, Kosovo intervention is evaluated on the Criteria of Responsibility to Protect, which legitimizes military intervention, and examined how appropriate the intervention is to the principles.
Authors and Affiliations
Mustafa Burak ŞENER
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP711603
- DOI -
- Views 46
- Downloads 0
İSTİSNA HALİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE TÜRKİYE’DE UYGULANAN KORONAVİRÜS ÖNLEMLERİNE DAİR BİR DEĞERLENDİRME
Schmitt’e göre egemen istisna haline karar verendir. Bu istisna hali hukukun kendisini askıya aldığı, içeri ile dışarının belirsizleştiği bir alandır. Bu alanda herhangi bir şey üzerine kesin hüküm vermek zordur. Bu sebe...
IS KURDISH REGIONAL GOVERNMENT IN IRAQ A NEW PERIPHERAL FRIEND FOR ISRAEL?
Israel’s relations with the surrounding countries have generally been explained with respect to the Arab-Israel dispute or with Israel’s famous periphery doctrine. It is not known whether the concept of the peripheral st...
SOĞUK SAVAŞ SONRASI ABD’NİN İNSANİ MÜDAHALESİNİ ETKİLEYEN TEMEL FAKTÖRLER
Soğuk savaş sonrası Amerika Birleşik Devletleri(ABD) doğrudan veya dolaylı olarak insani krizlere müdahil olmaktadır. ABD’nin öncülüğünde yapılan müdahaleler, bazı kesimler tarafından yasal olmasa bile meşru kabul edilme...
JEAN JACQUES ROUSSEAU’NUN ULUS-DEVLET DÜŞÜNCESİNİN ŞEKİLLENMESİ VE GELİŞİMİNDEKİ ETKİSİ
Bu araştırmada Rousseau’nun ulus devlet kavramı sürecine olan katkısından bahsedilmekte olup, 18. yüzyıl aydınlanmacı felsefesinin siyaset üzerine olan etkisinin, Avrupa siyasi sistemine nasıl uyum sağladığından ve Rouss...
“SO SOMEHOW PISSED OFF, BECAUSE I’M ACTUALLY TURKISH”. BETWEEN AFFIRMATION AND CRITIQUE OF MIGRATION SOCIETY DISCOURSES IN THE SCHOOL CONTEXT
This article, which is oriented towards subjectification theory, examines the experiences of pupils who are considered to be “with a migration background” in the school context, the migration-society related attributions...