Evaluation of Perceived Acceptability, Beauty and Value of Different Orthodontic Brackets

Journal Title: Journal of Dental Biomaterials - Year 2015, Vol 2, Issue 1

Abstract

Statement of Problem: Although different types of aesthetic brackets are introduced to orthodontic profession to reduce the complaints about the metallic braces, little studies have been done to assess patient's views regarding the attractiveness and acceptance of such brackets. Objectives: The goal of this study was to evaluate the perceived acceptability, beauty and value of different orthodontic brackets. Materials and Methods: In a cross-sectional study, three groups of subjects consisting of dental school clinic patients, specialty clinic patients, and art students were interviewed. Sample size was decided 116 in each group. The photographic images of six types of brackets which were placed in an adult mouth were shown to the subjects and they were asked to answer the questions that evaluate attractiveness by visual analog scale (VAS), acceptability of different brackets, and willingness to pay (WTP) for an aesthetic bracket in comparison to a regular bracket. Reliability was measured by giving questionnaires to 20 respondents by a two-week interval. VAS rating was compared by ANOVA. Mann U Whitney and Chi-square tests were used to compare the acceptability between groups when necessary. Results: The reliability measurement results performed by ICC were 0.86 for attractiveness, 0.6 for acceptability, and 0.93 for WTP questions. Lingual brackets had the highest attractiveness rating while metal brackets were considered the lowest aesthetic appliance by all groups of the study. The acceptability of ceramic bracket was highest in all groups. While most appliances evaluated had average acceptability, the large metallic brackets were rated very low. WTP for aesthetic braces was higher in art students than other groups. Conclusions: Lingual brackets were the most attractive but had very low acceptability rate. Small metal brackets had a good acceptability rate. Large metal brackets were the least attractive and had the lowest acceptability. Parents accepted aesthetic brackets for their children even when it cost more.

Authors and Affiliations

V Moshkelgosha, M Salahi, Sh Rostami

Keywords

Related Articles

Effect of pH and Lidocaine on the Compressive Strength of Calcium Enriched Mixture Cement

Statement of Problem: The pH of the human abscess has been measured as low as 5.0. This low pH could potentially inhibit setting reactions, affect adhesion, or increase the solubility of root end filling materials hence...

In vitro Investigation of Hydro-alcoholic Extract of Helichrysum leucocephalum on the Inhibition of Streptococcus Mutans Growth

Statement of Problem: Indiscriminate use of antibacterial agents increases the antibiotic resistance, which consequently necessitates seeking alternatives such as herbal remedies. Objectives: The aim of this study was to...

Laboratory Comparison of the Anti-Bacterial Effects of Spearmint Extract and Hypochlorite Sodium on Enterococcus Faecalis Bacteria

Statement of Problem: It is necessary to use irrigation solutions during cleaning and shaping of root canals to efficiently reduce the number of micro organisms. Sodium hypochlorite is used as an effective antibacterial...

The Effect of Mouthwashes on Surface Hardness of Dental Ceramics

Statement of problem: The effect of different mouthrinses on the surface characteristics of ceramic materials is not documented. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of three mouthrinses, contain...

Cone Beam CT Evaluation of the Prevalence and Characteristics of the Retromolar Canal

Statement of problem: Retro-molar canal (RMC) is of clinical significance because of its neurovascular content, which may be at risk of damage during the surgical procedures of the area. Objectives: The aim of the presen...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP248905
  • DOI -
  • Views 50
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

V Moshkelgosha, M Salahi, Sh Rostami (2015). Evaluation of Perceived Acceptability, Beauty and Value of Different Orthodontic Brackets. Journal of Dental Biomaterials, 2(1), 33-38. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-248905