Evaluation of Perceived Acceptability, Beauty and Value of Different Orthodontic Brackets

Journal Title: Journal of Dental Biomaterials - Year 2015, Vol 2, Issue 1

Abstract

Statement of Problem: Although different types of aesthetic brackets are introduced to orthodontic profession to reduce the complaints about the metallic braces, little studies have been done to assess patient's views regarding the attractiveness and acceptance of such brackets. Objectives: The goal of this study was to evaluate the perceived acceptability, beauty and value of different orthodontic brackets. Materials and Methods: In a cross-sectional study, three groups of subjects consisting of dental school clinic patients, specialty clinic patients, and art students were interviewed. Sample size was decided 116 in each group. The photographic images of six types of brackets which were placed in an adult mouth were shown to the subjects and they were asked to answer the questions that evaluate attractiveness by visual analog scale (VAS), acceptability of different brackets, and willingness to pay (WTP) for an aesthetic bracket in comparison to a regular bracket. Reliability was measured by giving questionnaires to 20 respondents by a two-week interval. VAS rating was compared by ANOVA. Mann U Whitney and Chi-square tests were used to compare the acceptability between groups when necessary. Results: The reliability measurement results performed by ICC were 0.86 for attractiveness, 0.6 for acceptability, and 0.93 for WTP questions. Lingual brackets had the highest attractiveness rating while metal brackets were considered the lowest aesthetic appliance by all groups of the study. The acceptability of ceramic bracket was highest in all groups. While most appliances evaluated had average acceptability, the large metallic brackets were rated very low. WTP for aesthetic braces was higher in art students than other groups. Conclusions: Lingual brackets were the most attractive but had very low acceptability rate. Small metal brackets had a good acceptability rate. Large metal brackets were the least attractive and had the lowest acceptability. Parents accepted aesthetic brackets for their children even when it cost more.

Authors and Affiliations

V Moshkelgosha, M Salahi, Sh Rostami

Keywords

Related Articles

The Influence of Surface Polish and Beverages on the Roughness ofNanohybrid and Microhybrid Resin Composites

Statement of the Problem: Surface roughness is a key factor in the aesthetics of restorative dentistry as it can determine the clinical quality and success of restorative materials. The chemical process of dissolution in...

Colour Stability of Various Types of Acrylic Teeth Exposed to Coffee, Tea and Cola

Statement of Problem: Acrylic teeth of dentures are prone to discoloration due to frequent exposure to different colouring solutions in the oral environment. Thus, in order to maintain their aesthetic appearance, they mu...

Influence of Incorporating Fluoroapatite Nanobioceramic on the Compressive Strength and Bioactivity of Glass Ionomer Cement

Statement of Problem: In order to increase the performance of glass ionomer cement, it is reinforced with metal powders, short fibers, bioceramics and other materials. Fluoroapatite(Ca10(PO4)6F2) is found in dental ename...

Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Resin Composites with Resin Modified Glass Ionomers

Statement of Problem: There are controversial reports regarding physical and mechanical properties of resin composites and glass ionomer cements. Some revealed higher strength and hardness for resin composites while othe...

Factors Affecting Oral Hygiene and Tooth Brushing in Preschool Children, Shiraz/Iran

Statement of Problem: Inadequate tooth brushing and inappropriate oral hygiene can lead to dental caries, the most common chronic diseases of childhood with several side effects. Objectives: To evaluate factors affecting...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP248905
  • DOI -
  • Views 86
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

V Moshkelgosha, M Salahi, Sh Rostami (2015). Evaluation of Perceived Acceptability, Beauty and Value of Different Orthodontic Brackets. Journal of Dental Biomaterials, 2(1), 33-38. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-248905