Evolution of the interpersonal conflict paradigm

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2008, Vol 3, Issue 7

Abstract

Using Brunswik’s (1952) lens model framework, Hammond (1965) proposed interpersonal conflict theory to explain the nature, source, and resolution of disagreement or “cognitive conflict” between parties performing judgment tasks. An early review by Brehmer (1976) highlighted the potential of this approach in, for example, understanding the structure of cognitive conflicts, and the effect of task and person variables on judgment policy change and conflict resolution. However, our bibliographic and content reviews from 1976 to the present day demonstrate that research on cognitive conflict using the lens model has declined sharply, while research on “task conflict” has grown dramatically. There has also been a shift to less theoretical precision and methodological rigor. We discuss possible reasons for these developments, and suggest ways in which lens model research on cognitive conflict can be revitalized by borrowing from recent theoretical and methodological advances in the field of judgment and decision making.

Authors and Affiliations

Mandeep K. Dhami, and Henrik Olsson

Keywords

Related Articles

How to make a risk seem riskier: The ratio bias versus construal level theory

Which statement conveys greater risk: “100 people die from cancer every day” or “36,500 people die from cancer every year”? In statistics where both frequencies and temporal information are used to convey risk, two theor...

Valuing bets and hedges

Two studies replicate the anomaly identified by Frederick, Meyer and Levis (2015) and Frederick, Levis, Malliaris and Meyer (2018). People show typical risk averse behavior by valuing risk below the focal lottery’s expec...

“Leaving it to chance”—Passive risk taking in everyday life

While risk research focuses on actions that put people at risk, this paper introduces the concept of “passive risk”—risk brought on or magnified by inaction. We developed a scale measuring personal tendency for passive r...

Strategies using recent feedback lead to matching or maximising behaviours

One challenge facing humans (and nonhuman animal) is that some options that appear attractive locally may not turn out best in the long run. To analyse this human learning problem, we explore human performance in a dynam...

Better is worse, worse is better: Reexamination of violations of dominance in intertemporal choice

Recently, Scholten and Read (2014) found new violations of dominance in intertemporal choice. Although adding a small receipt before a delayed payment or adding a small delayed receipt after an immediate receipt makes th...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677654
  • DOI -
  • Views 172
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mandeep K. Dhami, and Henrik Olsson (2008). Evolution of the interpersonal conflict paradigm. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(7), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677654