Evolution of the interpersonal conflict paradigm
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2008, Vol 3, Issue 7
Abstract
Using Brunswik’s (1952) lens model framework, Hammond (1965) proposed interpersonal conflict theory to explain the nature, source, and resolution of disagreement or “cognitive conflict” between parties performing judgment tasks. An early review by Brehmer (1976) highlighted the potential of this approach in, for example, understanding the structure of cognitive conflicts, and the effect of task and person variables on judgment policy change and conflict resolution. However, our bibliographic and content reviews from 1976 to the present day demonstrate that research on cognitive conflict using the lens model has declined sharply, while research on “task conflict” has grown dramatically. There has also been a shift to less theoretical precision and methodological rigor. We discuss possible reasons for these developments, and suggest ways in which lens model research on cognitive conflict can be revitalized by borrowing from recent theoretical and methodological advances in the field of judgment and decision making.
Authors and Affiliations
Mandeep K. Dhami, and Henrik Olsson
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP677654
- DOI -
- Views 183
- Downloads 0
Using Tversky’s contrast model to investigate how features of similarity affect judgments of likelihood
The representativeness heuristic suggests that similarity judgments provide a basis for judgments of likelihood. We use Tversky’s (1977) contrast model of similarity to design tests of this underlying mechanism. If simil...
Anti-social motives explain increased risk aversion for others in decisions from experience
When deciding for others based on explicitly described odds and outcomes, people often have different risk preferences for others than for themselves. In two pre-registered experiments, we examine risk preference for oth...
The influence of the ratio bias phenomenon on the elicitation of health states utilities
This paper tests whether logically equivalent risk formats can lead to different health state utilities elicited by means of the traditional standard gamble (SG) method and a modified version of the method that we call "...
Accounting for reciprocity in negotiation and social exchange
People generally adhere to the norm of reciprocity during both tacit and negotiated exchange. Emotional responses generated from profitable and unprofitable exchange facilitate the formation of motives to settle scores w...
On the descriptive value of loss aversion in decisions under risk: Six clarifications
Previous studies of loss aversion in decisions under risk have led to mixed results. Losses appear to loom larger than gains in some settings, but not in others. The current paper clarifies these results by highlighting...