“Еврейський антисемітизм” Карла Маркса
Journal Title: Науковий вісник Чернівецького національного університету імені Юрія Федьковича. Історія - Year 2017, Vol 1, Issue 45
Abstract
The concept of “Jewish antisemitism” adduced a strong feelings of an abnegation of Jewish national characteristics, arising from aprotracted nature of an identity crisis on condition of Jews’ assimilation. After the French Revolution the problem of national identity each of the European Jews solvedon an individual basis and chose the relevant for this strategy.Marxism was gaining popularity especially on “Jewish street”of traditional Eastern European town with it's religious ideals concerning social justice and the constant expectation of Jewish pogroms. It was not easy for K. Marx to get rid of his deep Jewish roots, because he came from the rabbinicallineage. The crisis of identity of the young Marx was in his ridicule of those who at least once reminded him of his ancestry.Obviously, Marx was selecting “Jewish antisemitism” asthe individual strategy for overcoming the crisis of identity anditwas the most convenient means of self-defense, especially under pressure of the newborn German nationalism, the first victims of which were G. Heine and L. Boerne. Instead, a prognosticof classical Marxism M. Hess, who in the early 1840's converted the young F. Engels to communism, has never denied his Jewish roots and emphasized the impossibility of assimilation changes for the Jews on national basis. Marx reacted with suspicion to the prophecy of “late”Hess on the possibility of Jewish nationalism (Zionism). However, Marx was conscious of the danger of Jews’ failed assimilation that would threatened to the victims of the national tragedy. This forced him to react by own strategy to overcome “Judaea”in his rationalistic doctrine. Talented compilation of disparate contemporary ideas of socialist and communist movements in the new revelation “The Communist Manifesto”appeared. The author has allowed it to curb its concern on the national identity in the field of social myth therapy. An important aspect is the affective component of Marxism: the pathos of hatred and revenge to “bourgeois”, which included those Jews who were well-known to Marx, as he was completely a bourgeois thinker. Perhaps because he not only transformed the “bourgeois”on the object of impassioned hatred, but also gave him a proportion of world historical figure. Responding to B. Bauer’saccusations concerning “the Jewish emancipation which does not apply Germans”, Marx, exposed the Jewish character of bourgeois society in his article “On the Jewish Question”in 1843, which has led some researchers to suspect its’author of the most influential social and political doctrine in the Jewish anti-Semitism.In contrast his anti-capitalism was aimed at critics of “Jewish self-interest of civil society”, primarily which, in the opinion of Marx were guilty Christians which “Jewish nationality to nationality merchant.” So his ostensive “anti-Semitism”was an attempt to neutralize accusations by real anti-Semitism. In his controversial model the Jewish Question solving Marx opposed the ethnoconfessional factor of estates-hierarchical caste society the principle of civil society in which the emancipation of the Jews became necessary precondition of total emancipation. Thus, the Marx’s “Jewish antisemitism”became a demonstration of assimilated Jew’sgelidrationality which was opposed to German’s empirical ethnicity. It was a testing of revolutionary metaphysics in class struggle, an attempt to avert the threat of ethnic nationalism that matured in the womb of bourgeois society, which Marx had planned to destroy by the forces of cosmopolitan proletariat and, therefore, to deprive the favorite image of “Jewish mercantilism”among all anti-Semites. He renewed the educational traditions of secularization the political life and encouraged to deep the processes of the Jews’ emancipation that were started in the late eighteenth century. But now the mission of the Jews’ liberation from feudal prejudices attributed not to the bourgeoisie, which discredited itself by exceptious emphasis to Jews’ anthropology but to the “proletariat”which like the Jews, according to Marx, deprived own ethnicity for the sake of social revolutionary.
Authors and Affiliations
Oleksandr Bezarov
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP292299
- DOI -
- Views 83
- Downloads 0
Соціально-страхова допомога радянської повоєнної системи в західних областях УРСР
The issues of population social security are also urgent in Ukraine in the 21st century. A lotof these issues still remain poorly studied. The purpose of this article is to clarify the circumstances of the social insuran...
Вплив інформаційних комунікацій на проєвропейський вибір української молоді
The definition of «community» is one of the key concepts in the theory and practice of Public Relations. Community is an active social formation, which is focused on the issue to find its solution. This issue should be o...
Галицькі та буковинські міста другої половини XIX – початку XX ст.: порівняльні особливості системи управління
The article made the comparative historical analysis of the cities of Galicia and Bukovyna (Lviv, Chernivtsi and Berezhany, Brody, Drohobych, Kolomyia, Peremyshl, Sniatyn, Sokal, Stanislaviv, Stryi, Vyzhnitsa, Kitsman, S...
Становлення і функціонування органів української влади на Коломийщині періоду ЗУНР (1918 - 1919)
The forms of revitalization of the national movement on the territory of Kolomiia are examined on the eve of the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Having being under the influence of national state Dnieper Ukraine...
Основні віхи дисидентської діяльності Валентина Мороза на Івано-Франківщині у 1964-1965 роках
The late 50s early 60s of the 20th century were marked by intensification of Ukrainian national movement. Condemnation of personality cult of Stalin at the Twentieth C.P.S.U. Congress and Khrushchov thaw created...