Examining the Approach of the Holocaust Purporters in their Juridical Protection of the Massacred Jews

Journal Title: جستارهایی در فلسفه و کلام - Year 2009, Vol 41, Issue 82

Abstract

The Zionist Jews have started widespread attempts and set up extensive propagations in countries over the world in order to attach importance to the Holocaust. They believe that the massacre of the Jews and the occurrence of the Holocaust have been carried out by Nazi Germany through killing the Jews in gas chambers and then incinerating them. Furthermore, the Jews have taken numerous measures in terms of sanctification of the Holocaust and codification of legal penalties against those who refuse to accept it as real and raise questions about it. An examination of the writings and comments of the Jewish commentators concerning the massacre of the Jews in the Second World War reveals a distinct contradiction between sanctification of the Holocaust, the massacred Jews, and their being regarded as sinful by the Jews. The Jewish commentators mainly believe that those massacred in the Second World War deserved Divine punishment for their disobedience to God and violation of Divine Law. In addition to this, some evidences indicate that if the Jews who are purported to have been imprisoned by the Germans waiting for death in gas chambers wanted to be released from their captivity, the Jews who claimed respect for those Jews and brought up legal guarantees for preserving their sanctity, not only did nothing to release them, but they may have impeded it as well. Examining the contradiction between sanctification of the massacred Jews on the one hand and regarding them as sinful and not helping their release during the Second World War on the other, is the issue addressed in this article.

Authors and Affiliations

GhulāMriḍā KhwāJī

Keywords

Related Articles

The Relation of Awwal, Ākhar, Ẓāhir, and Bāṭin to the Perfect Human Being

In theoretical mysticism, many of the mystical issues are attributed to the Qur'ānīc verses, among which is the noble verse "He is the First, He is the Last, He is the Manifest, He is the Unmanifest." The mystics have mo...

A Comparative Study of the Consequences of Faith from the Viewpoints of Paul and Fakhr Rāzī

One of the most important issues of Abrahamic Religions is faith. Paul the Apostle and Fakhr Rāzī, two thinkers in two religious fields of Christianity and Islam, have expressed their opinions in details in this regard....

An Analytical and Critical Look at the Concept of Logos from the Ancient Greek to the Church Fathers

The concept of Logos is seen figuratively before Christianity in ancient Greek philosophy and Judaism (Old Testament and some works of Filon of Alexandria). In ancient Greek philosophy, Logos is counted as the first prin...

Developments in the ‘Rule of Grace’ concept and referent in Shi‘ite theology

Although the concept of the ‘Rule of Grace’ can be accurately deduced through some Qur’anic verses and traditions (Hadiths), the Mu‘tazilites among all theological denominations pioneered in its extraction, compilation a...

An Examination and Analysis of the Ḥadīth on the Correlation of Knowing Oneself and Knowledge of God from the Viewpoint of the Shī‘a Scholars

Given the importance of theology and best ways of knowing it in the Islamic culture, this article is intended to examine the method of self-knowledge according to the ḥadīth, man ‘arafa nafsa faqad ‘arafa Rabba (he who k...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP202475
  • DOI 10.22067/philosophy.v41i1.3182
  • Views 115
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

GhulāMriḍā KhwāJī (2009). Examining the Approach of the Holocaust Purporters in their Juridical Protection of the Massacred Jews. جستارهایی در فلسفه و کلام, 41(82), 203-224. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-202475