Factors Associated with the Use of Endoskeletal and Exoskeletal Prosthesis Among Lower Extremity Amputees - A Tertiary Care Centre Experience

Journal Title: Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research - Year 2016, Vol 4, Issue 11

Abstract

Background: Prostheses are used after amputation for better function, cosmetic appearance, and a psycho-spiritual sense of wellbeing. But they are mired by discomforts and disadvantages. Compared to the conventional exoskeletal prostheses, the modern endoskeletal ones claim to be functionally superior. The primary objective of the study was to compare the factors associated with the daily use of endoskeletal and exoskeletal prosthesis among lower extremity amputees who have used the prostheses for a minimum period of 3 months. Secondary objective was to compare the mobility status of persons using endoskeletal and exoskeletal prostheses and to find the difference in social and emotional aspects of persons using endoskeletal and exoskeletal prostheses. Methods: This was a Cross sectional study, conducted from January 2014 to December 2014, at Government Medical College Hospital, Trivandrum. All the lower limb unilateral amputees who have used the prosthesis for a minimum period of 3 months who attended the Out Patient department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department were included in the study. Results: The endoskeletal prostheses were more silent during ambulation, with a statistically significant difference. With regard to utility, it was found that exoskeletal prosthesis had better performance. Regarding ambulation, appearance, frustration, perceived response, residual limb health, social burden and well being no statistically significant difference was noted between the two types of prosthesis. Conclusions: Endoskeletal prosthesis and exoskeletal prosthesis both are having an almost equal acceptability among lower limb amputees. Exoskeletal prosthesis has better performance altogether while endoskeletal prosthesis is better in the silent ambulation aspect.

Authors and Affiliations

Chitra G

Keywords

Related Articles

A Comparative Study of Pro Seal Laryngeal Mask Airway, i-gel and Combitube under General Anaesthesia for Elective Surgical Patients Requiring Controlled Ventilation

Aim: The Pro Seal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA), i-gel and Combi Tube (CT) in past evaluated alone or in group comparisons but differing study designs make it difficult to compare the results. The aim of this study was to...

To Evaluate Use of Combined Modified Ripasa Scoring and Ultrasonography to Improve Diagnostic Accuracyin Acute Appendicitis

Acute appendicitis is a common cause of abdominal pain for which a prompt diagnosis and treatment is rewarded by a marked decrease in morbidity and mortality. Routine history and examination both remain the most effectiv...

Prevalence of Anemia in School Going Children: A Prospective Study

Background: Anemia is one of the most important health problems throughout the world. Adolescent children are one of the major risk groups for anemia. Low oxygenation of brain tissues, a consequence of anemia, may lead t...

A Study of Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase and Uric Acidlevel in PreEclampsia in a Tertiary Health Care Centre in North-East India

Introduction: Pre-Eclampsia is a multi-system disorder of unknown aetiology, unique to pregnancy, onset after 20 weeks of gestation with hypertension to the extent of 140/90 mm Hg or more, and proteinuria (≥300mg/day) an...

Diagnostic Yield of Conventional Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy in a Resource Limited Setting

Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy is a commonly performed minimally invasive procedure in respiratory practice. Diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy varies considerably depending on indications and techniques used during bronchoscopy....

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP214791
  • DOI -
  • Views 63
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Chitra G (2016). Factors Associated with the Use of Endoskeletal and Exoskeletal Prosthesis Among Lower Extremity Amputees - A Tertiary Care Centre Experience. Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research, 4(11), 13851-13858. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-214791