Faculty Members’ Views on Academic Promotion and Appointment Process

Journal Title: Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi - Year 2017, Vol 7, Issue 1

Abstract

Despite the changes made related to academic promotion and appointment over the years in Turkey, there have been two main criteria: academic publications after PhD and foreign language proficiency. It commonly known that faculty members come across several problems during the process of attaining the title of associate professorship and these problems affect the academic environment in several ways. The purpose of this study is to reveal the faculty members’ views on the academic promotion in postdoctoral process and provide further suggestions.. Data were gathered through a semi-structured interview form including 10 items prepared by the researcher and analyzed through content analysis. In addition, a criterion table comprised of 25 items was applied to the participants before the interview. These criteria were determined by the InteruniversityBoard of Turkey and other universities. 18 faculty members marked the criteria they consider essential. Participants consisted of faculty members from science, social and medical fields. Results of the study revealed that faculty members considered associate professorship exam and foreign language exam necessary. According to the faculty members, the criteria related to publishing international articles and lecturing at undergraduate and graduate levels were especially very important among all criteria and the current system had a determinant role in the faculty members’ behaviors and academic publications. Faculty members stated that foreign language exam did not measure language proficiency accurately ; academic positions were not assigned fairly; there were some problems about the quality of academic publications, ethics and being a scientist. Similarly, they clearly stated that the society did not rely on scientists. The results gained in the study corroborate the need to review the academic promotion and appointment process. An increase in the number of such studies that examine faculty members’ perceptions is recommended due to their potential for providing a basis for future.

Authors and Affiliations

Engin DEMİR, Cennet GÖLOĞLU DEMİR, Mehmet Çağatay ÖZDEMİR

Keywords

Related Articles

The World University Rankings: Differentiations in Rankings According to the Expanded Indicator Set

The purpose of this study is to inform higher education politicians and managers about prior indicators to higher achievement in the rankings through forming an expanded-indicator set including indicators in various rank...

Perceptions Regarding the Logical Thinking of Academics

Thinking is a versatile and complex process. It begins with the birth of man and continues until his death. The important thing is how and in what ways this time is spent. The more accurate the thinking process is, the m...

Challenges in Doctoral Education and Coping Strategies: A Case Study

Along with the development of science, the need for academicians is also increasing day by day. In many countries doctorate is a prerequisite for academicians. So, doctorate is very important for the quality of higher ed...

Determining the Quality of Life of Students in Higher Education

Quality of life is affected by people’s cultures, situations, expectations, goals, standards, and value systems. This study aims to determine the quality of life of students in terms of their relations with academicians,...

An evaluation of Surveying (Geomatics) Engineering Teaching Staff’s Perspectives on the Department, Education and the Relationships with Students

This study is the first of two different studies that were done/are to be done on the department, education, and the relationship between teaching staff and students of the surveying (geomatics) engineering departments i...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP241231
  • DOI 10.5961/jhes.2017.179
  • Views 121
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Engin DEMİR, Cennet GÖLOĞLU DEMİR, Mehmet Çağatay ÖZDEMİR (2017). Faculty Members’ Views on Academic Promotion and Appointment Process. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 7(1), 12-23. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-241231