Family institution under spatiotemporal and ontological analysis

Abstract

This article reviews geography, essence, and regional particularities of worldwide family institution researches to identify the present condition and the perspective study areas. Necessity of this research is caused by current modernizing of family researches that will promote more effective realization of Ukraine`s research and development potential. There are certain scientific geographical schools studying the institution of family, each of them having somewhat different level of research development. We distinguish American, British, French, and Russian scientific schools. Ukrainian school deals with similar problems that Russian one, but less developed due to considerable lack of specialists directly involved in the research. Accordingly, these schools have different specialization, but the important fact is that in the U.S., UK, France, Germany, Japan, and more recently in Russia, studies focus on disclosing the essence of postmodern society development and its consequences for society and the institution of the family in particular. Analyzing the data we found that the main factors defining modern family transformation in Ukraine are the media, particularly the Internet and television, advertising, and education. Today’s epoch is marked by overall cultivation of the personal negative qualities and values that destroys social bonds and also leads to the individualization through the atomization of people in society. This atomization of society reduces public family relationships to primitive mechanical interaction. Spatial-ontological analysis of the condition of the family institution in Ukraine gave us the opportunity for a clear separation of the 3 macro-regions: Steppe Deep Crisis Region, Central Crisis Region and Western Region with Advancing Crisis. Historical-geographical, structural, and dynamic analysis of these regions and their components helped us to reveal ontological regional differences of the family institution caused by different stages of social transformation. The main regional consequence is that the most vulnerable situation is observed in the regions with strongly established industrial (modern) society, which is nearest to the postmodern one.

Authors and Affiliations

Anatoliy Melnychuk, Eduard Shchebet

Keywords

Related Articles

The role of individual farms in regional livestock production (the case of volyn region)

Livestock sector constitutes one of the leading agricultural branches in Volyn Region, since it provides both regional food security and economic benefits for individual farms, which currently are major livestock produce...

Estimate and predictive model of regional geodemographic system

The regional geodemographic system is a typical subject of a human geographer. Estimate and predictive model of geodemographic system, proposed in this paper, is created for pilot study of development tendencies of geode...

Monitoring of the status of tourism and recreation development in Ukraine

The main trends in the tourism and recreation field development in Ukraine in 2014 are covered in the article. The monitoring of a situation in the field of recreation and tourism for the period since 2000 to 2014 is car...

Consumer basket in Ukraine: a regional aspect

The article uncovers the consumer basket significance in formation and realization of social policy in Ukraine. The price of the consumer basket determines the living wage and ultimately, all other social standards, guar...

Geohistorical phases of planning structure development in the city of Ivano-Frankivsk

For a better understanding how to make a city planning of any city in the future, you should always carry a digression into history. The current study examines the concept of “geohistory of the city”, exploring the pecul...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP235757
  • DOI 10.17721/2413-7154/2016.76.38-43
  • Views 139
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Anatoliy Melnychuk, Eduard Shchebet (2016). Family institution under spatiotemporal and ontological analysis. Економічна та соціальна географія, 76(), 38-43. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-235757