Features of Evaluating the Enterprise Tax Competitiveness Using the Hierarchy Analysis Method

Journal Title: Проблеми економіки - Year 2016, Vol 2016, Issue 1

Abstract

The aim of the article is substantiating the provisions on the evaluation of the enterprise tax competitiveness using the hierarchy analysis method to identify the initial tax position of the business entity and the level of the "gap" between the actual state of its tax system and opportunities of the external tax environment. There have been proved a fragmentary character of developments in this area, which can be explained mainly by the novelty of the research object. The arguments in favor of feasibility of using the hierarchy analysis method to solve the problem of evaluating the level of the enterprise tax competitiveness have been presented. The generalized sequence for evaluating such competitiveness has been presented, which provides for the implementation of a number of stages: the formation of an expert group and organization of its work; statement of the problem and its structuring in the form of a hierarchy; diagnosis of the enterprise tax system according to specified parameters; identification of opportunities of external tax environment; comparison of the current enterprise tax system with opportunities of the external tax environment by building a matrix of pairwise comparisons; determination of eigenvectors and their normalized estimates for each pairwise comparison matrix in order to obtain priority vectors; evaluation of consistency of the pairwise comparison of matrices; building of the generalized priority vector; formation of conclusions and recommendations. The detailed description of each of these stages has been given. Application of the provisions on the evaluation of the enterprise tax competitiveness on the example of JSC "Drogobych truck crane plant" has been considered. It has been concluded that the level of the enterprise tax competitiveness is significantly lower than the opportunity of the external tax environment (generalized by 34.6%). This is despite the fact that in terms of some parameters of competitiveness the plant "underutilized" about 40% of the market opportunities.

Authors and Affiliations

Andrii Didyk

Keywords

Related Articles

Institution of Financial Accounting in the Architecture of Financial and Economic Institutions of the Information Society

The article considers financial accounting as a social institution of the information society represented by the activities on providing information services in the field of finance. Being individual systems, social inst...

Financial Regulation of Inflationary Developments in Ukraine on the Basis of the Cognitive Approach

The article discusses the essence and primary factors causing the inflationary developments in Ukraine. The effects of inflation on macro- and microeconomic performance indicators of the government and economic operators...

Cognitive modelling of processes of public-private partnership in Ukrainian regions

The article presents the authors' view on application of the cognitive modelling when managing processes of activation of the public-private partnership (PPP) in Ukrainian regions. The authors formed a system of concepts...

The Status of Liquidity Management Systems in Ukrainian Banks

The objective of the article consists in studying the status of principal elements of liquidity management systems in domestic banks. Basic liquidity management strategies of banks were analyzed, the necessity of impleme...

Scientific and methodical foundations of accounting and analytical provisions of profit administration in a company

The article considers organisation of accounting and analytical provisions on principles of strategic approaches. It systemises objects of accounting on the basis of its functional directions for perfection of profit adm...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP123089
  • DOI -
  • Views 77
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Andrii Didyk (2016). Features of Evaluating the Enterprise Tax Competitiveness Using the Hierarchy Analysis Method. Проблеми економіки, 2016(1), 274-281. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-123089