ФІКСАЦІЯ ТА ОЦІНКА РЕЗУЛЬТАТІВ СЛІДЧОГО ЕКСПЕРИМЕНТУ

Abstract

The article is devoted to the detailed consideration of the features of fixation and evaluation of the results of the investigator experiment. The main way of fixing the results of an investigator’s experiment is to compile a protocol of this investigative action. The author gives a detailed analysis of the content, requirements of the protocol of the investigator's experiment. The results of conducting an investigative experiment are considered. Also, the opinions of scientists in the field of criminal process, which investigated the features of the investigator of the experiment, are presented. Conclusions are made regarding the evaluation of the evidence of the results of an investigative experiment in court. The gathering, verification and evaluation of evidence in the activities of the investigator is one of the central places. The course of the investigator’s experiment and the results obtained with it should be documented. The protocol of an investigator’s experiment is a basic procedural document, which details the conditions, course and results of the conducted investigative experiment. The results of the investigator of the experiment are accepted by the court as evidence and subject to the assessment of the general rules for assessing the evidence gathered by the pre-trial investigation bodies. The evidentiary power of the results of the investigator's experiment is determined only by the reliability of the results and the correctness of the conclusions drawn. When assessing the results of the investigative experiment, the court proceeds first of all with the degree of correspondence achieved between the experimental conditions and the conditions of the investigated event.

Authors and Affiliations

Є. О. Гусаченко

Keywords

Related Articles

ІНСТИТУТИ ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ РЕАЛІЗАЦІЇ ПРАВ ЛЮДИНИ І РЕЛІГІЙНОЇ СВОБОДИ

The article examines the institutional framework for the realization of human rights and religious freedom. It has been established that the main institutions are government bodies, judicial bodies and civil society inst...

КОНСТИТУЦІЙНА РЕФОРМА В УКРАЇНІ: ВИКЛИКИ СУЧАСНОСТІ

The article is devoted to the research of constitutional reform in Ukraine, revealing the problems of ensuring its efficiency and effectiveness. The essence of the constitution as an object of reform, which has to combin...

ЗАКОННІ ПРИВАТНІ ІНТЕРЕСИ У ПОДАТКОВИХ ВІДНОСИНАХ ТА ЇХ ВІДМЕЖУВАННЯ ВІД ІНШИХ ІНТЕРЕСІВ ПЛАТНИКІВ ПОДАТКІВ

The article is devoted to analysis of the legal private interests of taxpayers, concretization of their content, delimitation from other private interests of taxpayers, including those that cause the appearance of abuses...

КРИМІНОГЕННІ РИЗИКИ АНТИТЕРОРИСТИЧНОЇ ДІЯЛЬНОСТІ В МІЖНАРОДНОМУ ВИМІРІ

The article is devoted to the discovering of anti-terrorist operations implementation criminogenic risks in the international dimension. It has identified three groups of criminality-criminal practices, related to anti-t...

СЛІДЧИЙ – СУБ’ЄКТ РЕАЛІЗАЦІЇ ЗВІЛЬНЕННЯ ВІД КРИМІНАЛЬНОЇ ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНОСТІ: НАПРЯМИ УДОСКОНАЛЕННЯ КРИМІНАЛЬНО-ПРОЦЕСУАЛЬНОГО ЗАКОНОДАВСТВА

The content rights and duties of the subject of criminal procedural relations, the investigator, concerning the release from criminal liability there investigated. The necessity, based on the analysis of the current and...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP604572
  • DOI -
  • Views 64
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Є. О. Гусаченко (2018). ФІКСАЦІЯ ТА ОЦІНКА РЕЗУЛЬТАТІВ СЛІДЧОГО ЕКСПЕРИМЕНТУ. Південноукраїнський правничий часопис, 1(), 75-80. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-604572