FISCALIZATION OF COPYRIGHT. CONTRIBUTIONS TO CLARIFYING CERTAIN ISSUES REGARDING FISCALIZATION OF COPYRIGHT (fiscus ubique praesens est)

Abstract

Intellectual creations and taxes have the gift (the first) and vice (the last) to be everywhere. Intellectual creations are sources of income for rights holders and the revenues incurred from their exploitation are, with some exceptions, taxed everywhere under a regime of favour. In some countries, the facilities granted are so attractive that the most important creators have established their headquarters in these „intellectual tax havens”. Researching the share of tax revenues from the capitalization of intellectual property rights in the total budgetary revenues of Romania in the last years, as they are highlighted in the annual budget laws, the first words spoken were: It can not! It can not be true! We can not be so low! According to Annex no. 1 of the state budget law, from the total amount of the planned revenues to be made in 2017, the amount of 96,825,000 lei is „income tax on the exploitation of intellectual property rights” and we find that it increased compared to 2016 with over 10,000,000 lei (from 86,384,000 lei), the forecasts for the following years being also of growth. Referring to the programmed amount to be made from the taxing of the results of the intellectual creation activity, we find that the share in the total state budget revenues is 0.082% (a sum that should not be worried by its small size only if we refer to the tax on profit of the commercial banks planned to be realized, that of 357,000,000 lei).

Authors and Affiliations

Viorel ROȘ, Andreea LIVĂDARIU

Keywords

Related Articles

VALUATION FOR BIOLOGICAL ASSETS WITH HISTORICAL COST ACCOUNTING OR FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING ?

The valuation for biological assets is regulated by IAS 41. Interesting debate is what valuation models it is better to use: historical cost accounting or fair value accounting? I will discuss advantages and disadvantage...

SIMULATED CONTRACTS BETWEEN THE OLD AND NEW CIVIL CODES OF ROMANIA

The world which gave birth to the New Civil Code is significantly different than the world of the 19th century of the Old Civil Code, as the development of social relationships has been tremendous in the last century, ma...

THE INFLUENCE OF THE GDP CONVERSION RATE INTO GNI ON SOCIAL PROGRESS. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AT THE EU LEVEL

Gross Domestic Product per capita is one of the main and indispensable indicators around which official reports are built representing thusthe comparative macroeconomic outcomes across states, being considered also a ben...

THE LEGAL REGIME FOR CUSTOMS DUTIES AND TAXES HAVING EQUIVALENT EFFECT IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

One of the consequences that generates direct, short, medium and long-term effects, determined by the accession of the states to the European Union, is that of valorizing also the free movement of goods. More precisely,...

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE RIGHT TO HEALTH CARE SYSTEM PRISON LAW INTENDED TO ROMANIAN NATIONAL HEALTH LAW

Health protection represents a protection measure for persons being a guaranteed right in Romania provided by the 34 Article of Romanian Constitution. The state is liable for taking measures of protecting physical and me...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP305741
  • DOI -
  • Views 110
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Viorel ROȘ, Andreea LIVĂDARIU (2018). FISCALIZATION OF COPYRIGHT. CONTRIBUTIONS TO CLARIFYING CERTAIN ISSUES REGARDING FISCALIZATION OF COPYRIGHT (fiscus ubique praesens est). Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ), 10(12), 790-8011. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-305741