FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT INFLOW IN 1997-2016 YEARS IN GEORGIA, UKRAINE AND MOLDOVA (COMPARABLE ANALYSIS)

Journal Title: Globalization and Business - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 5

Abstract

Resource deficit is a serious problem, but wealthy resources do not mean the riches of the country. One of the main reasons for the collapse of the former Soviet Union was ineffective use of rich natural resources. The Soviet economy, especially in the last years of its existence, was mainly dependent on income from the export of resources. Dropping prices on export resources have significantly damaged the country and have played a big role in the collapse of the former USSR. In the early 1990s, after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, new independent states, differently, but still found the way to build a market economy. Some of them have benefited from the richness of resources, while others more or less have taken advantage of innovations. Recently, one of the post-Soviet states (Georgia, Ukraine, Moldova) became associate members of the EU. The European integration vector has created new requirements. It becomes more actual to stimulate attracting foreign investments. In these processes the countries which use these foreign investments in accordance with logically elaborated and substantiated priority are getting more benefit. All three above-mentioned countries are suffering a serious problem of territorial integrity which obviously creates a lot of problems. The report is dedicated to the comparative analysis of only foreign direct investment (FDI) in Georgia, Ukraine and Moldova. Initially, the newly formed independent post soviet countries have suffered from a deficit of their own finances, and foreign investors were observing the current events and not hurrying. Countries should have their own model of development, to create the laws, structures, conditions for people to get dignified income to deepen the integrative processes and etc. Such tasks could not be completed in a short time, which was well understood by foreign investors. As a result in the early 1990s the scales of direct foreign investments in the analyzed countries were minimal, and then the processes were speeding up. The FDI played a key role in economic development of these countries.

Authors and Affiliations

LEVAN SILAGADZE

Keywords

Related Articles

Innovations as the Main Driving Force for the Development of National and World Economy

Due to the growth of the population and their needs is increased role of scientifi c and technical advances and technological innovation. As they are changing and are promoting world of economy and economic growth. Innov...

Security issues in wireless network

In the last period of time, security in wireless networks and quality of service, became very important and it is a subject of active researches. Communication signals which are extended in some environment can be receiv...

Population Migration Gravitational Models

In the paper Anca Gheorghiu’s and Ion Spanulescu’s model is represented as integral of time t (i.e. it is ta- ken into account the possible change in the parameters of the model over time) and in this integralisinsert...

About Some Aspects of Excise Tax on Tobacco Product (on the example of Georgia)

Considering Georgian reality excise tax is one of the most important and a growing component of the fiscal burden for the formation of budget revenue. In fact Georgian authorities plan to increase excise tax on to...

European Integration and Challenges to the Economy of Georgia

The worldwide processes of economic globalization and integration are irreversible. This, on the one hand, provides significant opportunities for small countries and contains some threats on the other hand. There are the...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP545662
  • DOI -
  • Views 75
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

LEVAN SILAGADZE (2018). FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT INFLOW IN 1997-2016 YEARS IN GEORGIA, UKRAINE AND MOLDOVA (COMPARABLE ANALYSIS). Globalization and Business, 5(5), 143-147. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-545662