Frameworks for the measurement scales development in mixed methods research

Journal Title: Український соціум - Year 2015, Vol 4, Issue 55

Abstract

The article presents analysis of four mixed methods frameworks for measurement scales development andvalidation. Three of themare presented in English-speaking sources and one–in the domestic: IDCV(A.Onwuegbuzie, R. Bustamante, J. Nelson), MDVR (R. Luyt), PEMI (P.-M. Daigneault, S. Jacob), and TVMS(S.Dembitskii). Common to all approaches is the use of the consistent design. Given the status of the components,approaches are different. IDCV, MDVR and PEMI use the equivalent status of quantitative and qualitativecomponents, while TVMS-approach is based on the dominant status of the qualitative. Another important differencebetween the approaches is the specificity of their iteration. Relatively speaking, the IDCV, MDVR and PEMIiteration, has inductive character–at almost every stage obtained findings may force researchers to adjustmethodology, or to return to a previous stage for its re-implementation. This is precisely defining the specifics of thestage within which the relevant findings were obtained. Regarding TVMS, iteration has rather deductive character–all results are inspected not only with the consideration of the specific phase within which they are derived, but alsowith the consideration of theoretical positions that form the basis of the measuring technique validation and areconsidered to be theoretically valid. Thus, although the approaches and paradigms belong to a mixed type ofresearch, they significantly differ from each other due to the differences of the theoretical and methodologicalprovisions they are based on. So, A. Onwuegbuzie, R. Bustamante, J. Nelson offer a specially crafted approach. R.Luyt uses the concept of measurement validity by R.Adcock and D.Collier. P.-M. Daigneault, S. Jacob insist on thespecial approach in its research efforts after obtaining unexpected results. S. Dembitskii refers to the concept oftheoretical validity.

Authors and Affiliations

Serhii Dembitskyi, Bohdana Khlyapatura

Keywords

Related Articles

SOCIAL EXCLUSION IN THE CONTEXT OF WELFARE MODELS: CROSS-COUNTRY COMPARISON

Strategies to increase the people’s standard of living and reducing their social exclusion vary according to the models of social welfare, which were historically developed in different countries. There are differences a...

TRENDING SURVEYS OF THE FALL 2017: YOUTH POLICY, INCLUSIVE EDUCATION, SEX LIFE, SEXUAL VIOLENCE

Paper presents results of the Innovative Youth Surveys U-Report for October-November 2017: youth awareness of priority areas for youth policy development, inclusive education, sexual debut and the practices of condom use...

THE ASSESSMENT OF THE SOCIO-POLITICAL SITUATION AT THE END OF 2016

Based on a nationwide survey, authors present the level of interest in political processes and assessment of the political situation in Ukraine. The balance of trust is shown to organizations, public institutions, public...

Shadow income and other extra-legal practices of population: the scope and dynamics

Authors analyzed the dynamics of the involvement of the economically active population in the informal economy (in various practices and processes, such as corruption, shadow income, tax evasion); the level of involvemen...

FLEXIBLE NON-STANDARD EMPLOYMENT: THE SYSTEMATIZATION OF THE FORMS AND ITS USE ON LABOUR MARKET OF UKRAINE

The paper considers methodological and practical development problems of employment flexible forms. It is established that the standard employment is increasingly giving way to non-standard forms of employment, which dev...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP481886
  • DOI -
  • Views 140
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Serhii Dembitskyi, Bohdana Khlyapatura (2015). Frameworks for the measurement scales development in mixed methods research. Український соціум, 4(55), 37-45. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-481886