Fund Collection through Litigation by the State Treasury in the Roman Empire (with Special Reference to the First Three Centuries A.D.)
Journal Title: Studia Ceranea. Journal of the Waldemar Ceran Research Centre for the History and Culture of the Mediterranean Area and South-East Europe - Year 2012, Vol 2, Issue
Abstract
The paper discusses the confiscation of property (publicatio bonorum) as a source of revenue for the fiscus in ancient Rome. The term fiscus means, among other things, the public property, State funds, but also the private property of emperors. The confiscated property could be adjudged not only to aerarium – the State Treasury (publicare), but also to the personal treasury of emperors, and trials seem to have been inspired to supply it. The most „successful” accusation was connected with the crime of lese-majesty: the scope of this crime was especially wide and it was easy to convict the defendant. The Senate often voted for adjudgement of the confiscated property in respect of the Emperor, especially if the convict had received some benefits from him. This practice turned into a rule and the Emperor’s treasury became the sole beneficiary of publicatio bonorum. Some emperors are especially known as rulers accumulating their private property on confiscated goods (Caligula, Septimius Severus, Domitian). A portion of those goods was due to the children of the defendant; some rescripts issued by the emperors even ordered to transfer his whole property in the first place to his descendants. In spite of the rule that it was necessary to find the defendant guilty to confiscate his property, the publicatio bonorum was not available; when he committed suicide before the sentence, a presumption was made that this act was equal to a guilty plea. According to another rule – confessus pro indicato est – the defendant was convicted unless his suicide was justified. The personal belongings (pannicularia) were to be confiscated, too, but only after the conviction.
Authors and Affiliations
Marzena Dyjakowska
Book Reviews: Święci Konstantyn-Cyryl i Metody. Patroni Wschodu i Zachodu [Saints Constantine-Cyril and Methodius. Patrons of the East and the West], vol. I (pp. 254), vol. II (pp. 334), ed. Aleksander Naumow, Collegium Columbinum, Kraków 20131 [= Biblioteka Duchowości Europejskiej, 5].
Book Review.
Book Reviews: Uczniowie Apostołów Słowian. Siedmiu Świętych Mężów [Disciples of the Apostles of the Slavs. The Seven Holy Men], ed. Małgorzata Skowronek, Georgi Minczew, Collegium Columbinum Cracoviae, Kraków 2010, pp. 216 [= Biblioteka duchowości europejskiej, 4].
Book Review.
Book Reviews: Иван Божилов, Анна-Мария Тотоманова, Иван Билярски, Борилов Синодик. Издание и превод [Boril’s Synodicon. Edition and Translation], София 2010, pp. 386
Book Review.
Book Reviews: Z dejín slovensko-srbských vzťahov [Aus der Geschichte der serbisch-slowakisch Beziehungen], ed. Miroslav Daniš, Vydavateľstvo STIMUL, Bratislava 2012, pp. 198 [= Acta historica Posoniensia, 19].
Book Review.
Book Reviews: Apokryfy syryjskie. Historia i przysłowia Achikara. Grota skarbów. Apokalipsa Pseudo-Metodego [Syriac Apocrypha. The Story of Aquihar. The Cave of Treasures. Pseudo-Methodius’ Apocalypsis], trans. A. Tronina, ed. A. Tronina, M. Starowieyski, Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków 2011, pp. 264 [= Pisma apokryficzne, Series, 6].
Book Review.