Genetic testing and risk interpretation: How do women understand lifetime risk results?

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2010, Vol 5, Issue 2

Abstract

Genetic screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2 gives women the opportunity for early detection, surveillance, and intervention. One key feature of genetic testing and counseling is the provision of personal lifetime risk. However, little attention has been paid to how women interpret lifetime risk information, despite the fact that they base screening, treatment and family planning decisions on such information. To study this vital issue, we set out to test the ability of women to choose the most appropriate interpretation of National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) message about lifetime risk of developing cancer for a woman with altered BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Participants included 277 women who had not undergone genetic testing or had cancer and 207 women who had undergone genetic testing or had cancer. Over 50% of the women who had not undergone genetic testing or had cancer and 40% of those who had undergone genetic testing or had cancer misunderstood NCI’s information. Furthermore, in line with a growing body of research, we found that high numeracy level (objective or subjective) is positively associated with a woman’s ability to correctly interpret NCI’s message.

Authors and Affiliations

Yaniv Hanoch, Talya Miron-Shatz and Mary Himmelstein

Keywords

Related Articles

Too soon to tell if the US intelligence community prediction market is more accurate than intelligence reports: Commentary on Stastny and Lehner (2018)

Stastny and Lehner (2018) reported a study comparing the forecast accuracy of a US intelligence community prediction market (ICPM) to traditionally produced intelligence reports. Five analysts unaffiliated with the intel...

Self-reported ethical risk taking tendencies predict actual dishonesty

Are people honest about the extent to which they engage in unethical behaviors? We report an experiment examining the relation between self-reported risky unethical tendencies and actual dishonest behavior. Participants’...

The use of mixed models in a modified Iowa Gambling Task and a prisoner's dilemma game

Researchers in the decision making tradition usually analyze multiple decisions within experiments by aggregating choices across individuals and using the individual subject as the unit of analysis. This approach can mas...

The attraction effect in motor planning decisions

In motor lotteries the probability of success is inherent in a person’s ability to make a speeded pointing movement. By contrast, in traditional economic lotteries, the probability of success is explicitly stated. Decisi...

A new test of the risk-reward heuristic

Risk and reward are negatively correlated in a wide variety of environments, and in many cases this trade off approximates a fair bet. Pleskac and Hertwig (2014) recently proposed that people have internalized this relat...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677727
  • DOI -
  • Views 134
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Yaniv Hanoch, Talya Miron-Shatz and Mary Himmelstein (2010). Genetic testing and risk interpretation: How do women understand lifetime risk results?. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(2), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677727