Genocide, ethical imperatives and the strategic significance of asymmetric power: India’s diplomatic and military interventions in the Bangladesh Liberation War (Indo-Pakistan War of 1971)
Journal Title: Security and Defence Quarterly - Year 2022, Vol 38, Issue 2
Abstract
This paper seeks to understand if the political, legal and ethical imperatives of a humanitarian war justified Indian military intervention in East Pakistan. It examines the asymmetric, dynamic national power equations that shaped the Bangladesh Liberation War and the genocide that preceded the conflict. At the height of the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, this conflict was a key flashpoint in South Asia. This research was undertaken through a qualitative literature review with the help of declassified archival documents and media from numerous national archives and government databases across the world. Aided by emerging insights, perspectives and research, this paper seeks to evolve, extend and expand our existing understanding of events as they unfolded within the overall matrix of this conflict. The results show that India’s ability to align its foreign policy and media narratives to its military objectives while adroitly managing big power rivalry holds lessons for how smaller states might compel strategic concessions from big powers and global institutions. This requires them to navigate both the asymmetry of national power and the asymmetry of attention during a conflict to secure their interests. In conclusion, recent times have seen an increasing trend for major global powers and alliances to declare war in the name of humanitarianism. The political and ethical imperatives of a humanitarian war in 1971 dovetailed seamlessly with larger Indian strategic goals and was one of the catalysts for the eventual unanimous adoption in 2005 of the global political commitment known as Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in the United Nations.
Authors and Affiliations
Rudrajit Bose
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP705776
- DOI https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/146060
- Views 155
- Downloads 0
Nations at war: Why do nations participate in war and why not? - A report on the participation of National Defence University representatives at the International Scientific Conference in Sofia, organised by the Euro-Atlantic Conflict Studies Working Group within the framework of the Partnership for Peace Consortium of Defence Academies and Security Studies Institutes
----------
The evolution of the Hungarian security policy thinking between 1989-1999, with a special view on the Hungarian Defence Forces.
Hungarian security policy thinking went through basic and crucial changes in the last two decades. As a result, we can see a kind of "evolution", which starts from a former Soviet satellite state status through to a peri...
Current challenges to the non-proliferation regime: Iran and North Korea. A summary of professor Harnisch’ lecture
----------
Rentier economy of the Kurdish region in Iraq as a source of barriers for the regional security sector reform
Despite the uncertainty about the Peshmerga’s status, western countries besides training and arming the Iraqi Kurds are working with them to reform Peshmerga forces. The aim of this article is to identify and explain som...
Rules for the transfer of weapons and military technology in the light of contemporary international law
This study investigates the contents of key documents of international rank regulating the transfer of weapons and military technologies in order to mark the principles that rule this kind of state activity. The followin...